Evaluation of the performance of a soy protein seed lubricant

Dr. Nicole Fiorellino, Extension Agronomist
University of Maryland, College Park

With the arrival of a new seed lubricant product (DUST, Low Mu Tech, Calamus, IA), we evaluated its performance against two common seed lubricants, Graphite and Fluency (Bayer Crop Science, USA), and untreated check (UTC) plots in both corn and soybeans in 2019 at Wye Research and Education Center in Queenstown, MD. DUST is a soy protein lubricant and is reported to contribute to early plant vigor as well as be a cleaner alternative to commonly available seed lubricants such as graphite, which can create a mess for users of the product. As such, we utilized a completely randomized design with five replicates and evaluated emergence and early season vigor at 7, 14, and 21 days after planting (DAP). Stand counts were reported as number of 1,000 plants per acre, with plants counted in a 30 ft length of one corn row and plants counted in an area the size of 1/1000 of an acre in soybean plots. Early season vigor was assessed through collection of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) readings using a handheld Greenseeker sensor held approximately 1 m from the surface of the ground as the operator walked down the length of one corn or soybean row per plot. Corn was harvested when moisture approached 15% and yields are reported in bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.

Differences among seed lubricant treatments for plant population, early season vigor, and crop yield were analyzed using a mixed model analysis of variance using replication as a random variable using SAS 9.4 software. Coefficient of variation (CV%) are reported as a measure of variability at a test site and values less than 10% indicate enough precision existed to determine a significant difference.

Corn

 

Soybeans

 

 

Results

Based on the measurements observed in 2019, the DUST soy protein seed lubricant is comparable to other seed lubricants commonly used in Maryland for corn and soybean planting. There were no differences in emergence or yield among the treatments for either corn, indicating all seed lubricants perform as well as each other and a control plot with no seed lubricant used. Additionally, there was no effect of seed lubricant on early season vigor, as indicated by the company. Additional extension reports will include soybean yield data and economic analysis of the products, as there is a difference in price and amount of product recommended for use and if product performance is similar, as indicated by these results, then product cost will be a deciding factor for use.

Managing Fusarium Head Blight

Alyssa Koehler, Extension Plant Pathologist
University of Delaware

Andrew Kness, Agriculture Agent
University of Maryland Extension, Harford County

When it comes to controlling Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) and keeping deoxynivalenol (DON) levels low, it is important to have an integrated approach. Considering the disease cycle of FHB (Figure 1), the FHB pathogen (Fusarium graminearum and other Fusarium sp.) is able to grow on crop residues from corn and small grains. In your field rotation plan, try to avoid planting wheat or barley into corn residue; this will help to reduce the amount of initial inoculum in your field. As the pathogen grows on debris, it eventually releases spores that can be rain dispersed or moved through air currents. While the grain is flowering, spores land on the head or anthers, colonize these tissues, and move into the grain head. Once inside the grain, water and nutrient movement is disrupted which results in the bleached florets we associate with FHB (Figure 2). Shriveled and wilted “tombstone” kernels can reduce yield and result in grain contaminated with mycotoxins. DON, also referred to as vomitoxin, is a health hazard to humans and animals. Wheat heads colonized later in development may not show dramatic symptoms, but can have elevated DON.

Figure 1. Fusarium Head Blight Disease Cycle. For more information on the FHB disease cycle visit https://www.apsnet.org/edcenter/disandpath/fungalasco/pdlessons/Pages/Fusarium.aspx Image: apsnet.org.

In addition to rotation considerations, seed selection is another important piece of FHB management in wheat. There is no complete host resistance against FHB, but you can select wheat varieties with partial resistance. The University of Maryland sets up a misted nursery to compare FHB index and DON levels across local wheat varieties to aid in variety selection decisions https://scabusa.org/pdfs/UMD-UDE_Misted-Nursery_Factsheet-2018.pdf. Unfortunately, barley does not have any resistance to FHB. At this point in the season, rotation order and variety are established, but you can consider these factors as you plan for next season.

Figure 2. Wheat head with Fusarium head blight. Image: Andrew Kness, University of Maryland.

As we think about 2019 in-season disease management strategies, a well-timed fungicide application can help to reduce disease severity and DON levels. It is important to remember that fungicides can help to reduce disease levels and DON (traditionally around 50% reduction on a susceptible variety) but they do not eliminate FHB or DON. To try to maximize the efficacy of fungicides, it is important to apply at the correct timing. Fungicides for FHB are most effective when applied during flowering in wheat and at head emergence in barley. As wheat approaches heading, the Fusarium Risk Assessment Tool (www.wheatscab.psu.edu) is a forecasting model that uses current and predicted weather forecasts to predict FHB risk. This tool is historically about 70% accurate, and can help you assess your risk for developing FHB as your wheat approaches flowering. The pathogen that causes FHB infects through the flower, and rainfall 7 to 10 days prior to flowering increases spore production and risk of infection. Optimal wheat fungicide application is at early flowering (10.5.1) to about 5 days after. For initial signs of wheat heads beginning to flower, look for yellow anthers in the middle of the wheat head. When at least 50% of main stems are flowering, you will want to initiate fungicide applications. As the flowering period continues, anthers will emerge from the top and then the bottom of the wheat heads (Figure 3). Anthers can stay attached after flowering but usually become a pale white.

Method of fungicide application is also important. Flat fan nozzles pointed 90° down are great at covering foliage; however do not do a good job of covering the heads, which is where the product needs to be located. Use nozzles that are angled forward 30-45° down from horizontal (30 degrees is better than 45) or dual nozzles angled both forward and backward. Research has shown that a single forward-angled nozzle or nozzles angled forward and backward allow for significantly more product to contact the head and increase fungicide efficacy. Optimal spray volume is 10 gallons per acre.

Triazole (FRAC group 3) fungicides that are effective on FHB include Caramba (metconazole), Proline (prothioconazole), and Prosaro (prothioconazole + tebuconazole). This year, a new mixed mode of action product is on the market, Miravis Ace. This product contains propiconazole (DMI, FRAC 3) and pydiflumetofen (SDHI, Group 7). On the label, application can begin at Feekes 10.3 through 10.5.2. Although this product can be applied at the earlier timing, preliminary data has shown that optimal FHB control and lower DON levels are achieved at the 10.5.1 timing or a few days beyond this timing. If you spray too early, heads that have not emerged will not be protected by the fungicide application. Rainfall during flowering can increase levels of FHB and delay the ability to get into fields to apply fungicides. The expanded application window of Miravis Ace may offer options if periods of extended rainfall are in the forecast. However, if the weather allows, 10.5.1. to about 5 days after appears to provide the best control to reduced DON. We will be collecting local data on optimal application timing in Georgetown this spring. As a reminder, fungicides containing strobilurins (QoI’s, FRAC 11) should not be used past heading because these fungicides can result in elevated levels of DON.

Figure 3. From left to right Feekes 10.5, Feekes 10.5.1 (beginning flowering), Feekes 10.5.2 (flowering growth stage), Feekes 10.5.3 (full flower). Image: C. Knott, Univ. of Kentucky https://mccracken.ca.uky.edu/files/identifying_wheat_growth_stages_agr224.pdf.