Unit Five’s Unusual Find

This past week while excavating our Unit (a 5’ by 5’ measure of restriction), in Annapolis, my group partners and I came upon a very novel and exciting new discovery. The suspicion of an absence of a specific soil type was raised by the evidence of a borderline separating two apparent soil types within a small defined area of the unit. I immediately brought this unexpected find to the attention of others. After slowly and carefully scraping away the surface layers, we were able to conclude that indeed something different was going on here. However, we were not aware yet of the unique formation that was about to be re-brought into view.

By following this border between a very white mix of coal and ash soil and a very rich brown soil we came upon a very distinct horseshoe shaped deviation. The shape was clear yet unusual in appearance. However, its purpose and means of formation was very unclear. As instructed, we began to carefully remove some of the richer brown soil from the interior of the horseshoe to make sure this ash did not reappear inside indicating that the level of stratigraphy had a burrow in it in this location. In the search for this soil we came upon a notable amount of large bricks that were appearing within this portion of the unit. Large bricks were also observed within this same level on the exterior west side of the horseshoe but their occurrences were not so dense and possibly unrelated. In the continuation of the excavation past this ash layer we came upon even more bricks, all within this same limited area.

Continue Reading »

Print Friendly
0 Comments

Unit 5

Archaeology in Annapolis has been a blast this past week and a half. I’ve learned so much more about Archaeology and the process of Archaeology in the past week than AI thought I would ever know.

There have been many quick adventures and learning curves; such as immediately breaking a shovel. On the first day. But, it was a great experience to go through so that we know how to act and react when a situation arises, with a little bit of improvisation (we had to use a flat head shovel instead), and some modified filed notes (because we changed the type of shovel we were using, we had a slightly large STP); the Standard Test Pit (STP) we had been digging went on to be completed successfully. STPs are designed to do exactly that, test the area, or survey the area to determine whether or not a site is in fact present, usually determined by whether or not there are artifacts present- an artifact being any item that has been acted upon by a human (if a natural resource), or pieces of an object, if not a whole object, that belonged to a human such as discarded toys, ceramics, pipes, tools, etc.

After the tiny mishap on day one, I get assigned to Unit 5; which is a lovely little 5 X 5 (5 feet by 5 feet). The space that we are digging was selected for a unit because when we were digging STPs we found artifacts such as coal, brick, and other material items of interest in that particular area in the yard. I and my unit mates are told that we are digging in what was allegedly a garden at one time. Interestingly, some of the artifacts that we are finding, and some of the layers of dirt actually seem to verify the idea. Such as we dug down into a layer of ash, which may have been in the so called garden to promote healthier soil for plants to thrive in. We have also recovered seemingly obscene amounts of coal inclusions, and continue to find more coal as we dig through more layers.

In addition to things that support the theory that there was a garden in or near the spot we are digging in, we have also found other potentially random artifacts, including brick, glass, and fragments of ceramics, pennies, and old rusty nails. There have also been fragments of hard plastic in some of the levels.

I am very curious about what all the bricks, which appear to be random inclusions, got to where they did and why they are in that formation since they do appear  to be buried in a random pattern; and I look forward to digging more to see what else we can find.

 

Print Friendly
0 Comments

The Construction of Urban Infrastructure and the Process of Governmentalization – Lecture by Prof. Matt Palus

Today, Prof. Matt Palus visited Annapolis and gave a lecture relating to his dissertation topic involving the use of infrastructure building by governments in order to organize the society to optimize its control and authority. Dr. Palus studied public utilities such as electrification, and enclosed sanitation within Annapolis and its surrounding suburb of Eastport.  Traditionally, archaeologists had not seen value in studying these modern conveniences as something that could answer questions about societal structure.

Dr. Palus contends that the government’s mandate for connection to public sanitation services, the discourse related to the improvement of public health, and the acceptance of the government directive by the citizenry constitutes ideology. According to Mancuse large systems such as these transform societies. The primary concern of the people becomes the maintenance of system. The apparatus becomes a form of control.

Additionally, Foucault’s theory of the creation of self-discipline by creating the sense being perpetually monitored is reinforced when the government becomes governmentalized is evident in the city where public services are controlled by the government and social statistics and the apparatus of security are applied.  The measures of the population, the functioning of the economy, and the maps of sewer lines are examples of such statistics. As for the apparatus of security, census takers, health officers, and those responsible for public works are seen as examples. The street lights and sewers themselves are seen as apparatuses of security and become the material culture of the government.

Continue Reading »

Print Friendly
0 Comments

Unit 3 Characteristics So Far

Marbles from Unit 3

Marbles from Unit 3. Source: Kate Deeley

A lot of exciting things have been happening in the Archaeology in Annapolis field school for the past several days. My group has been assigned Unit 3 and so far has made some interesting discoveries even though it is still too early to draw conclusions regarding the information we have uncovered. Despite finding an immeasurable amount of coal and brick fragments, Unit 3 has yielded some peculiar artifacts, particularly glass marbles, 3 clear ones, 1 blue and 1 green. What is interesting about these marbles is that they were all found in level B and roughly close to each other. Although it is too soon to get excited about something like that, screening soil from other levels would give us more information about the relevance of the marbles and whether there are more find.

Another interesting development with Unit 3 is the presence of a possible feature that is situated well below level B. Initially, digging through Unit 3 was somewhat of a challenge since it is elevated on its Eastern side, thus proving challenging to keep the levels aligned when excavating. It is important, however, that everything remains equal and flat if we are to appropriately draw any conclusions from our finds. While getting to the bottom of level B, the team noticed that there is a large amount of reddish clay that covers much of the layer B. There are several soft spots of soil that are situated in the middle of the Unit and are very close to each other. Although this is just a speculation, it is possible that the soft spots are a remnant of postholes that were used in the construction of some sort of a feature. Again, this is just speculation, however further excavations into these soft spots and the Unit 3 in general would give us a better understanding of what was situated in the area of Unit 3 and what was its purpose. It is truly exciting to have a hands-on experience when attempting to answer such questions.

Print Friendly
0 Comments

The Arbitrariness of Power

Here are some photos from the first week of field school. Lots of fun in hand.

IMG_20130529_133319_546
Sifting dirt through a 1/4 inch mesh screen.

IMG_20130529_145137_812
Using Munsell color system to determine soil color and a nice paper bag to collect artifacts.

IMG_20130531_133037_830
Shovel Test Pit, screen, 5 gallon bucket, ruler, sheet of plastic, Munsell book, journal, pile of dirt

IMG_20130531_133024_358
Soil sample from Shovel Test Pit (STP).

IMG_20130529_145732_608
A brick or pottery sherd with lead glaze and arching score marks.

IMG_20130529_152831_339
Returning after a hard day at the site.

I am intrigued by the idea behind Ferdinand de Saussure’s “the arbitrariness of the sign.”
These are some basic notes to myself.
What are the goals?

Surveillance.
Surround sound.
We are watching each other.
You watch me while I watch you.

In field school this spring we are looking not only at power but the oppressed. In one of the articles for the first week’s reading we learned about Dr. Mark Leone’s idea surrounding his model of ideology. Leone’s ideology is a construct of ideas for a period of time, re-presenting a particular present time in the past. In this present it is simultaneously reproducing its past with all of what is good and bad as part of this snapshot. It is a package. In the colonial package we have the power structure, an economic system, bondage and freedom, capitalism and the birth of a wealthy and powerful state, let’s say Maryland, where the cost of production that produces this package in itself contains a puzzle and a problem.

Continue Reading »

Print Friendly
0 Comments

Independent Study in the Archaeology in Annapolis Lab

For the past 2 semesters, I have been working in the Archaeology in Annapolis Lab in Woods Hall. This is my first year at Maryland, and I wanted to get a feel for the work being done in the archaeology department. Dr. Leone’s Archaeology in Annapolis program was a major factor in my decision to transfer to Maryland, so I welcomed the opportunity to get to work with the artifacts from previous field school sessions.

The other undergrad students and I were involved in multiple steps of processing the artifacts from washing, sorting/classifying, cataloging, labeling, mending, and completing a minimum vessel count. Many of the artifacts we worked with related to Kate Deeley’s research on African American communities in Annapolis. Kate helped us grasp the concept of minimum vessel counts and stressed the importance of each step in the process of labeling, mending, and identifying rims in order to determine the minimum count of vessels located within the site. This data, when used in conjunction with the ceramic types and other associated remains, creates a view into the lifeways and social status of the people that occupied the area. For example, one site yielded a large number of sherds of whiteware ceramics with nearly matching shell edge designs. They were similar in color and style, but not exact matches. This might lead to speculation that the people could not afford to purchase more expensive sets all at one time. However, you must be careful not to make assumptions based on any one interpretation of the artifacts. Having matched sets may represent status but, according to Kate, this could indicate that these particular residents were interested in putting together a set of these dishes, but not necessarily concerned that they be a perfectly matched set. That is just one of the many valuable lessons I learned in the Annapolis lab.

One of the unexpected benefits of working in the lab was the involvement of the PhD program student assistant directors. Kate, Beth, and Ben are a wealth of information and are always happy to give input and advice. They are intimately involved in the excavations and are utilizing this research for their PhD projects. The enthusiasm and generosity of everyone in the lab have really made me excited to join them this summer for a session in the field.

Print Friendly
0 Comments

Filipinos in Annapolis: Recognizing A Forgotten Past

Last summer, I found myself starting a new journey with Archaeology in Annapolis in exploring the forgotten history of Filipino immigrants in the city. From 1898 to 1946, Philippines was an American territory, allowing a mass exodus of laborers into the country as nationalists. In 1901, the U.S. began recruiting Filipinos into the Navy. Annapolis became a focal point for these U.S. Navy men who helped build the Naval Academy, served officers as stewards, and prepared meals for midshipmen as messmen. Despite this long-term presence, their contributions to the city remained unrecognized.

 

United States Navy men posing for a picture. Photograph supplied by Toribio family.

In the summer of 2012, I decided to answer these questions through my graduate internship. For months, I conducted oral interviews of members from the descendant (pre-1965) and current (post-1965) community. Despite demographic changes from the early to late 20th century – gender, socioeconomic status, and social/legal barriers – the different stories intertwined under the common themes of alienation, struggle, and transformation.As a Filipino-American, this history intrigued me. Who were these men? Where did they live? How did they carve out a life for themselves in a foreign land? What traditions did they continue to practice and what new ones did they create? What is the community like now?

Continue Reading »

Print Friendly
0 Comments

Reynolds Tavern: Adventures in Site Report Writing

Reynolds Tavern, 7 Church Circle, Annapolis.

Reynolds Tavern, 7 Church Circle, Annapolis. Source: http://www.flickr.com/people/auvet

In 1984, excavations ceased at the historic Reynolds Tavern in Annapolis.  Four years later, I was born.

You could say I solidly missed the opportunity to excavate this site, one of the first of many projects to be undertaken by Archaeology in Annapolis.  Reynolds Tavern, built by William Reynolds on Annapolis’ historic Church Circle, has served variably as a home, a tavern, a hat shop, an inn, a bank, a library, and a restaurant since its construction in 1747.  Records tell us that Reynolds made hats in his basement, ran a tavern upstairs (though intermittently), and sold slaves from his front porch.  The building has had a long history since its original owner, but Reynolds has remained its namesake; today the building operates as a restaurant of the same name, with a small inn upstairs and a popular pub in the basement.

Reynolds Tavern met its first archaeologists in Kenneth and Ronald Orr, who undertook the initial excavations in 1978.  Four years later, the project came to Archaeology in Annapolis, and three more seasons of archaeological work took place.  Notes were recorded, drawings drawn, pictures taken, artifacts cataloged.  Now thirty years later, these were my pathways to the site I would end up re-excavating, step by step, only this time armed with nothing more than post-it notes and a scanner.

When I was first invited to finish the site report for Reynolds Tavern, which had been picked up and picked at only a few times over the years, I was intrigued, but also a bit unsure of whether or not it was a task I would be able to accomplish, so far removed by time from the excavations themselves.  Not being able to associate notes with the actual experience of working on a site left me feeling blind, and more than a little lost.  However, not even a month later, what I found myself in the middle of was a mental excavation.  Peeling back layers of data, trying to associate one item with another of the same paper ‘strata’, making notes on exactly where I was finding what and trying to piece it together later.  The artifacts were just codes on a page, the units just sketches on paper, but slowly, I began to see what had happened thirty years ago.  Despite my initial trepidation (and some admittedly mind-scattering notes from the 80s), the Reynolds Tavern site report has come together, piece by piece, and proved to be both an adventure and a truly gratifying learning experience. (Though I’ll take the field any day, but wouldn’t we all?)

But this adventure in site-report-writing has not been without its exciting moments.  There’s much more to this story: there are the actual finds of the 1980s excavations (the well, the cobblestone road, the African bundles, among others), the exhibit-to-be in the basement of the present day Reynolds Tavern, the discovery of the artifacts (again!) in the secret, cavelike room beneath Woods Hall, and as of today, the hundreds of photographic slides pulled from archives to be digitized for the first time.  But these are other blog posts, for other weeks!  Until next time.

Print Friendly
0 Comments

The Sun is the Same, in a Relative Way

Personification of Time

Personification of Time by Carstian Luyckx, 1650

How well the skillful gard’ner drew
Of flowers and herbs this dial new;
Where from above the milder sun
Does through a fragrant zodiac run;
And, as it works, th’ industrious bee
Computes its time as well as we.
How could such sweet and wholesome hours
Be reckoned but with herbs and flowers!

- Andrew Marvell, The Garden (1681)

The above poet describes the natural rhythms of a garden landscape—the opening and closing of flowers, the path of the sun across the sky, and the movements of animals—and how one can understand time in this way. This intuitive sense of timekeeping seems to be in contradiction to the strict segmentation of many of our busy days into regular hours and minutes. With the advent of “factory time” and a standardization of hours, the day became regimented by the minutes on the clock rather than the flows of nature—corresponding to the similar increased order and symmetry in landscaping, architecture, and dining brought about in the Georgian era—that is, the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries (see Leone and Shackel for more information on this process). The world of economic elite during this time became a very segmented and ordered place, including the way they thought about time. However, I don’t think there is a complete separation between an intuitive, natural timekeeping and an artificial, Georgian one.

Continue Reading »

Print Friendly
0 Comments