Soybean Aphid Populations Increasing

Hayden Schug, Agriculture Agent | hschug@umd.edu
University of Maryland Extension, Charles County

Soybean aphids have been spotted in several fields across Southern Maryland this week, with notable activity in St. Mary’s County and Charles County. Infestations were first observed along field edges but have since been found deeper into the canopy in some locations. As you can see from the pictures, the fields look relatively healthy from the road, and it isn’t until you enter the field that you notice the large aphid populations, which is why it is important to keep scouting your fields regularly. Aphids were clustered on the undersides of leaves, along petioles, and around new growth, with many plants showing multiple colonies. In some spots, the density was high enough that honeydew, a sticky sweet substance aphids excrete, was visible creating a sheen on leaves and causing fungus to grow.

Soybean field
Soybean Field at threshold for aphids with no obvious visual signs. Image. H. Schug, Univ. of Maryland.

The soybean aphid is a small, yellow-green insect with black cornicles protruding from the rear of its body. Winged forms are dark with clear wings, while wingless forms are pale and slow-moving. Aphids feed by piercing plant tissue and removing sap, which can stress plants, reduce photosynthetic efficiency, and in high numbers, lead to leaf curling, yellowing, and stunting. Prolonged feeding during the reproductive stages (until R6) can lower pod set, reduce seed fill, and ultimately cause measurable yield loss. In addition to direct feeding damage, soybean aphids can transmit plant viruses, although this has not been a major yield factor in Maryland.

Scouting and Thresholds

University research across the Midwest has established an economic threshold of 250 aphids per plant, averaged across multiple sampling points, with populations actively increasing and plants still in the <R6 stages. Scouting should involve checking 20–30 plants per field, spread across several locations, including edges and interiors. The undersides of leaves and growing points are key inspection sites, as aphids prefer sheltered feeding areas.

Small green aphids on underside of soybean leaf
About 80 aphids are on the underside of this leaf. Image: H. Schug, Univ. of Maryland.

Natural enemies, including lady beetle adults and larvae, green lacewing larvae, minute pirate bugs, and various parasitoid wasps, play an important role in regulating aphid populations. Their activity should be noted during scouting. In some cases, robust predator populations can keep aphid numbers below threshold, especially if environmental conditions are unfavorable for aphid reproduction. Rain events can also play a key role in knocking down large aphid population levels, so this must be taken into account when making management decisions.

Management Considerations

If thresholds are reached and plants are still younger than R6, an insecticide application may be warranted. Although you should also take into consideration the weather and the 1.3-2.5% yield loss from wheel tracks with applications made during R1-R5. Pyrethroid products have been the primary tool for soybean aphid control in the Mid-Atlantic, but resistance has been confirmed in parts of the upper Midwest. Although Maryland populations have not shown resistance that I am aware of, it is important to rotate insecticide modes of action where possible to delay resistance development. Follow label directions closely, including restrictions on application timing and rates, and be aware of preharvest intervals.

Hot, dry conditions can favor both aphids and spider mites. If using a pyrethroid during these conditions, monitor for mite flare-ups in the weeks following treatment. Avoid unnecessary applications to preserve beneficial insects, which are critical for season-long pest suppression.

In summary, soybean aphids are present but only a few fields show damaging levels in most Southern Maryland. Continued monitoring is key, and management should be based on established thresholds to protect yield while minimizing unnecessary insecticide use.

Small, white aphid molts on green soybean leaf
Soybean leaf covered in molted aphid skins. Image: H. Schug, Univ. of Maryland.

August Field Crop Insect Scouting

David Owens, Extension Entomologist | owensd@udel.edu
University of Delaware

The month of August is a critical month for scouting field crops. Right now, full season beans are between R3 and R5, while double crop soybean is either just starting to flower or will be soon. Scouting soybean can save money in two ways: finding a problem that wasn’t anticipated and not finding anything worth spraying. This month we have been in fields that fit both categories, as well as fields that an insecticide could have been left out.

The main threat for full season soybean comes from stink bugs. R4 and R5 are the most critical times to scout for stink bug activity. Stink bugs tend to concentrate along field edges, especially those bordering wood lines with wild cherry and maple and those bordering corn fields. If you do not see a sizeable population there, the odds of having one in the field interior are low. If a field edge is above threshold, go out into the field. Its not uncommon for those populations to decline 150-200 feet from the field edge. The most commonly used threshold for stink bugs is 5 bugs (adults and nymphs, all soybean-feeding species combined) per 15 sweeps. We grow an unusual amount of Plenish soybean which garner a bit of a premium, quality is a bit more important, and some folks tell me it takes them longer to dry down for harvest. I think it is justifiable to go with a bit of a lower threshold for those, around 4 bugs per 15 sweeps. Fortunately this year, stink bug blacklight trap captures have not been high.

At some point in August, our main corn earworm flight comes in, putting any full flowering soybean field at risk. Please keep checking with your local extension agent or closest earworm trap counts. So far this year, our flight seems to be a bit late, but that can change in a hurry! Earworm tends to be a quick moving flash in the pan. Moths come in, about 7-10 days later calls come in, and two weeks later there are no earworms to be found, but they can do a lot of pod feeding in that short window. The youngest earworms you may find in a sweep net will be a bright, translucent orange or orange-ish blue color with a dark head capsule and short bristly hairs. Larger earworm can be somewhat variable in color. Some are pink, yellow, yellow with some black on them, and green morphs which can be confused with green cloverworm. The best resource I know for determining if a field is over threshold is North Carolina State University’s corn earworm calculator: https://soybeans.ces.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/CEW-calculator-v0.006.html. Plug in your sampling method, control cost, soybean price, and row width. For some rough ball park numbers, this generally comes out to between 2.5 and 4.5 earworm in a 15 sweep sample. With low soybean prices it may be tempting to use a cheap pyrethroid, but beware, they are not reliable.

Another factor worth considering is how to treat insect pests this late. Soybeans are going to have less ability to compensate for drive-down damage. If you have a field of tall beans that have good to excellent yield potential and canopy thickness and a smaller sprayer boom, drive down damage can be substantial. An aerial application might be a bit more expensive, but the spray plane wont damage beans.

Before finishing, I wanted to send you other pest updates. Earlier this week I came across a field with a heavy population of soybean aphid which is very unusual. If you come across a field with a lot of broken, flagged trifoliates, it is a sign of possible Dectes infestation. Prioritize those fields for as timely a harvest as possible.

Sorghum: Sugarcane aphid (now called sorghum aphid) is starting to show up in sorghum. Occasionally this yellow-white aphid can build up in such large numbers as to cause crop injury. Look for it underneath mid-canopy leaves. Late sorghum that has not yet pollinated may be attractive to corn earworm for egg laying so be sure to scout heads.

Good insect id and proper product and rate selection are critical. Besides a sweep net, your most valuable scouting tool is your phone. Snap a picture and text it to someone for confirmation. There’s also an app, the MyIPM app for Row Crops which includes pictures, chemicals, rates, and brief overviews. Check it out. And sometimes, by scouting a field, you may see something else that needs addressing, like broken pivot nozzles. Good luck getting your soybean and sorghum to the finish line!

August 2025 Grain Market Report

Dale Johnson, Farm Business Management Specialist | dmj@umd.edu
University of Maryland Extension

Corn

This month’s 2025/26 U.S. corn outlook is for sharply higher supplies, greater domestic use and exports, and larger ending stocks. Projected beginning stocks for 2025/26 are 35 million bushels lower based on a slightly higher use forecast for 2024/25. For 2024/25, larger corn exports are partly offset by reductions in corn used for ethanol and glucose and dextrose. Corn production for 2025/26 is forecast at a record 16.7 billion bushels, up 1.0 billion from last month with a 1.9-million acre increase in harvested area and higher yield. If realized, this total would be 1.4 billion bushels more than the prior record set in 2023/24. The season’s first survey-based corn yield forecast, at a record 188.8 bushels per acre, is 7.8 bushels higher than last month’s projection. Sorghum production is forecast up 24 million bushels to 391 million. The yield is forecast at 69.0 bushels per acre, slightly above last month’s projection while harvested area is up 0.4-million acres. Total U.S. corn use for 2025/26 is forecast 545 million bushels higher to 16.0 billion. Feed and residual use is raised 250 million bushels to 6.1 billion based on a larger crop and lower expected prices. Corn used for glucose and dextrose is projected lower based on observed use during 2024/25. Corn used for ethanol for 2025/26 is raised 100 million bushels to 5.6 billion. Exports are raised 200 million bushels to a record 2.9 billion reflecting U.S. export competitiveness and expectations of relatively low world market prices. With supply rising more than use, ending stocks are up 457 million bushels to 2.1 billion and if realized would be the highest in absolute terms since 2018/19. The season-average corn price received by producers is lowered 30 cents $3.90 per bushel.

Soybeans

The 2025/26 outlook for U.S. soybeans includes lower beginning stocks, production, and ending stocks. Beginning stocks are lowered 20 million bushels on an increase to crush and exports in the prior marketing year. Soybean production for 2025/26 is forecast at 4.3 billion bushels, down 43 million on a lower area partly offset by a higher yield. Harvested area is forecast at 80.1 million acres, down 2.4 million from July. The first survey-based soybean yield forecast of 53.6 bushels per acre is up 1.1 bushels from last month. With lower supply and the slow pace of export sales to date, exports are reduced 40 million bushels. Crush is unchanged at 2.54 billion bushels. U.S. ending stocks are forecast at 290 million bushels, down 20 million from last month. The U.S. season-average soybean price for 2025/26 is forecast unchanged at $10.10 per bushel. The soybean meal price is forecast at $280 per short ton, down 10 dollars. The soybean oil price forecast is unchanged at 53 cents per pound.

Wheat

The outlook for 2025/26 U.S. wheat is for slightly tighter supplies, reduced domestic use, higher exports, and smaller ending stocks. Supplies are reduced on lower production, down 2 million bushels to 1,927 million on smaller harvested area only partly offset by a higher yield. The all wheat yield is raised 0.1 bushels per acre to 52.7. Production forecasts are decreased for Hard Red Spring and White, but increased for Hard Red Winter, Durum, and Soft Red Winter. Domestic use is lowered 5 million bushels on reduced food use, based primarily on the latest NASS Flour Millings Products report. Exports are raised 25 million bushels to 875 million on the continued strong early pace of sales and shipments, particularly for Hard Red Winter. Projected ending stocks are reduced by 21 million bushels to 869 million. The 2025/26 season-average farm price is reduced by $0.10 per bushel to $5.30 on a lower projected U.S. corn price and price expectation for wheat the remainder of the marketing year.

Maryland Regional Crop Reports: August 2025

Western Maryland

Our precipitation has become more spotty in recent weeks. The corn and most of the soybeans are looking good. It won’t be long before the corn silage harvest begins. We did have a microburst that laid some corn flat in a very small area. Even though we have had good moisture in June and July, the corn hasn’t rooted as deeply as in drier years. I think we will have good yields. I wish the price were better. The second cutting grass hay and second and third cutting alfalfa have been better this year. Until next month, I wish you timely showers.—Jeff Semler, Washington Co.

Central Maryland

Rains continued to be scattered throughout the county over the past month. Temperatures have thankfully dropped this week. Corn is looking good and in the milk to dough stage. There is some lack of pollination in the top several rows on the ear. Soybeans are developing pods. Minimal feeding from pests such as green cloverworm and Japanese beetles is present. Beneficial insects, such as lady beetles and spiders, are also present! Montgomery County is currently being inundated with spotted lanternflies, but they are more of a nuisance pest and won’t cause issues in agronomic crops.—Kelly Nichols, Montgomery Co.

Northern Maryland

Rains have been consistent in the region; some storms have been severe and brought several inches of rain in an hour, but in general, we are getting just the right amount of moisture. Most of the corn crop looks very good with most heading into dough and dent stages. There have been some localized reports of tassel wrap affecting pollination. You can find tar spot and gray leaf spot and a few other minor pests, but in general, the crop looks very good. Full season soybeans are putting on pods and look good; some are extremely tall, which worries me as tall beans don’t always yield well. We will see what August brings. Second cutting hay has as been made in between the rains.—Andy Kness, Harford Co.

Upper & Mid Shore

As the reproductive crop stages continue in corn and soybeans, this 2025 season looks to be a very successful one. Pop-up rain showers have continued throughout July, keeping drought conditions at bay. This has greatly helped dryland crops, and has minimized irrigation use. Wheat and barley harvest have finished and average yields are looking very good. The good growing conditions have allowed noxious weeds to proliferate, particularly along field edges. This season has been especially hot and humid leading to disease pressure that has affected fruit and vegetables producers.—Travis Ford, Caroline Co.

Lower Eastern Shore

The weather has been wetter this month than the previous, although rains have been variable across the region, with some areas of the lower shore even facing excessive rain. Corn is looking OK, but there is concern about how the earlier season drought stress will affect yield. Irrigated corn looks good. Soybean is looking average across the region. Farmers are spraying fungicide, a second round of herbicide, and cutting hay.—Sarah Hirsh, Somerset Co.

Southern Maryland

We have enjoyed the cooler weather for the last two weeks, but that is coming to an end. Wheat harvest wrapped up with good yields and quality, but some fields were delayed due to rain and equipment breakdowns. Corn is tasseling or has finished up and is looking strong after timely rains. Soybeans are off to a good start, and most double-crop beans are coming along but could use some more rain. Weed pressure is picking up in spots after earlier showers. Overall, crops look good heading into the heat of summer.—Hayden Schug, Charles Co.

*Regions (counties):
Western: Garrett, Allegany, Washington. Central: Frederick, Montgomery, Howard. Northern: Harford, Baltimore, Carroll. Upper & Mid Shore: Cecil, Kent, Caroline, Queen Anne, Talbot. Lower Shore: Dorchester, Somerset, Wicomico. Southern: St. Mary’s, Anne Arundel, Charles, Calvert, Prince George’s

Tar Spot is Starting to Appear in Maryland

Andrew Kness, Senior Agriculture Agent | akness@umd.edu
University of Maryland Extension, Harford County

Tar spot has started to pop up in corn fields and we have received several reports from Harford, Cecil, Queen Anne’s, and Kent County, Maryland over the past couple of weeks. These reports are about one month earlier than we have first reported tar spot in years past, with the July 23 confirmation of tar spot in Cecil County being the earliest.

Fortunately, all reports and all of the fields I have scouted myself, tar spot is present but at very low levels. The predominant disease I am seeing right now remains gray leaf spot, which makes sense as this is a disease that prefers warmer temperatures and tar spot tends to favor cooler temperatures.

With tar spot being present in our region earlier than usual, growers should be vigilant with scouting and monitoring this disease. Most of the corn crop in Maryland is at or close to R3 or near even near black layer in southern Maryland, which is towards the tail end of major yield concerns associated with disease infection. Furthermore, acres treated with a fungicide between VT-R3 should have sufficient protection to get them through grain fill. If you have corn that is later tasseling you will want to pay special attention to these fields to monitor tar spot levels and other foliar diseases that could potentially reduce yields. These fields may warrant a fungicide pass if you were not planning it already.

As you are scouting your corn fields, be on the lookout for tar spot. With funding from the USDA-NIFA, we are conducting a survey of tar spot’s distribution in Maryland. If you have tar spot, or think you might, please report it to corn.ipmpipe.org or reach out to me at akness@umd.edu or (410) 638-3255. Reports are kept anonymous and individuals and/or farms are not identified in any public reports or publications.