Early-Season Soybean Pests 

Hayden Schug, Agriculture Agent | hschug@umd.edu
University of Maryland Extension, Charles County

As soybean planting gets underway across Maryland, it’s important to watch for early-season pests that can impact stand establishment and ultimately yield potential. 

Seedcorn maggots are a common problem in freshly tilled fields, especially those with high organic matter or recent manure applications. Maggot feeding can destroy the sprouting seed, leading to weak stands or gaps in rows. An insecticide seed treatment containing neonicotinoids (such as thiamethoxam or clothianidin) can protect against seedcorn maggot. Additionally, monitoring soil temperatures and avoiding planting into cool, wet soils can help minimize risk.

Slugs are another concern in no-till and cover-cropped fields. They thrive in moist, heavy residue environments and can cause heavy feeding injury to cotyledons, stems, and young leaves. Good furrow closure at planting is critical, open seed furrows can create a pathway for slugs to reach seeds and seedlings before emergence. Slug baits containing iron phosphate or metaldehyde can be applied if damage is severe, but results are often variable. Managing residue to reduce slug habitat and scouting early are important preventative steps.

Bean leaf beetles may also move into emerging soybeans, feeding on cotyledons and early leaves. While light feeding typically does not justify treatment, heavy populations can reduce stands. Insecticide seed treatments should provide adequate protection, however, if high populations persist, foliar insecticide applications labeled for bean leaf beetle, such as pyrethroids, can be used if defoliation thresholds, 30% for vegetative growth, are met.

Timely scouting is critical. Examine plants as they emerge, especially in fields with a history of early pest issues, cover crops, or heavy residue. Focus on stand counts and visible injury, and determine if replanting or other action is needed based on stand loss and defoliation thresholds. A pest timeline for common soybean insect pests is found in the figure attached.

Screening Palmer Amaranth to Common Postemergence Herbicides

Kurt Vollmer, Weed Management Specialist, University of Maryland Extension
and Mark VanGessel, Weed Management Specialist, University of Delaware

Palmer amaranth continues to be a major concern for farmers on the Eastern Shore. Many populations are already known to be resistant to glyphosate (Roundup) and Group 2 herbicides (e.g., Sandea, Raptor). Additionally, in North Carolina, some populations have developed resistance not only to glyphosate and Group 2 herbicides but also to Liberty and Callisto. 

To investigate if there is a shift in Palmer amaranth response to commonly used herbicides in our region, we collected seed samples from 17 sites across the Eastern Shore. Most of these fields had been planted with soybeans, and seeds were collected in September. After cleaning, the seeds were stored in a refrigerator for three months to improve germination.

We evaluated each population with four herbicides all applied postemergence: Callisto, Reflex, Enlist One (2,4-D), and Liberty. At least five individual plants from each population were treated with each herbicide.

All the populations were susceptible to Enlist One and Liberty at the normal use rate (1 qt/A for each). However, nine of the populations had at least one plant survive when treated with Callisto, and five populations survived a Reflex application.

We are partnering with Penn State University to conduct further analysis to determine if we are seeing Palmer amaranth resistance developing to Callisto or Reflex in our region. 

It is important that Palmer amaranth infested fields get treated with two effective modes of action, applied at full rates. Research has demonstrated that tankmixing two effective modes of action is better for managing resistance than using them in sequence. And do not rely on the same modes of action year after year. Scout fields shortly after application to determine if control was adequate, and if it was not, follow up to avoid Palmer amaranth “escapes” from going to seed.

Review the article from the April 4, 2025 Weekly Crop Update for additional considerations on Palmer amaranth control.

Update on Research for Management of BMR Male Sterile Forage Sorghum

Thomas Kilcer, Field Crops & Soils Educator (retired)
Cornell Cooperative Extension
Figure 1. BMR male sterile forage sorghum trial in NY produced over 30 T/A of 35% DM silage.

We are at the same stage of BMR male sterile sorghum as we were in the early stages of winter triticale work 30 years ago. We can see the huge benefits on farms, but we are trying to develop the best management techniques to optimize the farmer’s success with this crop. Winter triticale forage was 1.5 – 2.0 tons of dry matter when we started. It is now 3.5 to 4 tons dm/A in the north and as high as 6.5 t/dm/A in the south. Harvested at peak nutrition, triticale now has higher milk potential than good alfalfa haylage. Now, we are developing management to bring male sterile BMR sorghum to that level of results and replace corn silage in the dairy diet.

Farmers growing the BMR male sterile sorghum have seen an increase in butterfat as the crop was added to the ration. With the high sugar content of 25 to 30% of DM (corn silage is 1 – 4%), you get all the benefits of extra sugar without the cost. Compared to other sugar sources, this is a steady, slow-release sugar that enhances rather than overwhelms the rumen. Production was as high as corn silage. In last year’s dry conditions, nearly all reported far higher sorghum yields than with the corn silage. Corn seed cost is higher than $180/acre while sorghum is about $25/acre. Sorghum is without the cost and effort of multiple fungicide sprays now required on corn. It is a completely organic way of killing corn root-worms. They hatch out in the sorghum field and, after taking a bite of the root, are dead from prussic acid. It does not get corn tar spot. Sorghum planted in warm soil and narrow rows (7.5 inches) quickly shades the ground to eliminate weed competition. It also intercepts raindrop impact to stop or reduce the erosion common on newly planted corn ground. A benefit we found earlier is that deer love to hide in sorghum and then come out to eat your neighbor’s corn. We have no feedback on the impact of a bear yet.

We see tremendous potential for organic farms. They plant corn silage because that is what farmers are supposed to do. As soon as it emerges, on the nice days, they are out cultivating to stay ahead and beat the weeds. Unfortunately, at that time of year, nice days used for cultivating are lost for the haylage harvest that loses quality literally by the day. For growing sorghum without herbicides, it MUST be planted in warm soils – 65ºF or more. This allows it to jump out of the ground and outgrow the weeds. I have measured foot-tall sorghum growing more than 3 inches a day (21 inches in a week). So sorghum is planted after the haylage harvest, which is now able to be cut on time.

When we first started working with sorghum, the seeding rate suggested by seed sales was 10 to 15 lbs. or more per acre. At that rate the population was over 160,000 seeds/acre. In 30-inch rows, that is nearly a solid stand in the row. It had major lodging before harvest as a result. Most companies are now suggesting about 60-80,000 seeds/acre. In a 30-inch row that is still too tight, there is significant lodging. A corn planter with Milo plates and the drawbar offset 7.5 inches will plant very accurate 15-inch rows by doubling back and driving on the same tire tracks. This will allow you to double the space between the plants in the row at the same population, and greatly improve lodging resistance. Planting at 7.5-inch rows is ideal and gave us the highest yield without lodging. The plants were more uniformly spaced in the field. Unfortunately, drills are a controlled dump and do a horrible job of uniformly spacing the seeds. Adding insult to injury, the accordion tubes on most drills catch the seed and then dump it in clumps, negating the row spacing advantage. Air drills, properly set up, have been found to have the potential for very accurate seed placement.

Our research here at the University of Tennessee was targeted to determine the optimum row width and plant population for male sterile BMR sorghum. The staff worked very hard to get a replicated trial of three row widths (7.5, 15, and 30 inches) at populations of 30,000, 60,000, 90,000, 120,000, and 150,000 seeds/acre. It came up and grew nice until early July. Then, a wicked line of thunderstorms rolled through with high winds, downpours, and heavy hail. My house lost 10 panes of glass in the front from the golf-ball-sized hail. A friend nearby got softball-sized hail that destroyed the side of her house and all the windows on that side.

The worst was the many hundred acres nearby of fresh tomatoes under plastic that were just sizing the fruit. All were destroyed. My sorghum trial still had the 30,000 and 60,000 plant populations standing, the rest was flattened. Those rows that stood lasted until September, when Hurricane Helene finished completely flattening the stand. Yes, even researchers are hammered by bad weather.

Fortunately, Jodi Letham, the regional Cornell Agronomist for Western NY, had an identical trial with 15-inch and 7.5-inch rows planted with an air drill near Geneseo, NY. It stood perfectly at all populations and yielded up to 30 tons of 35% DM silage/acre in a drought year. The advantage of the 7.5-inch row width showed in the yields of over 60,000 plants/acre were 25 to 30 tons/acre of silage. Interestingly, the NDFd30 peaked at about 60,000 harvested plants/acre to maximize the feed value. This is starting to support our hypothesis that increasing stalk diameter by controlling population and row width will increase the digestible component of the forage. This is preliminary, and more work needs to be done in this area.

We are also looking at some outside-the-box alternatives. One is to use a naturally occurring plant growth regulator, ethephon (not legal – research only). This concept is to use a normal BMR sorghum but eliminate the fertile seed so the sugars stay in the plant cells like a male sterile BMR would. This would eliminate the problem of outside pollen blowing into the field, as seen in some of our research. The trial went great, except we did not use a high enough rate and had a full seed set on all treatments. That is why we research so you will not have to make mistakes. As one farmer said with a smile, “we knew you were a professional screw up, but thank you so we don’t make the same mistakes.”

We are presently going to test seed treatments to accelerate germination and emergence. This gives the plant a running start on the weeds, which is critical for the organic farms switching to this from corn silage. We will repeat the row/population trial and the ethephon trial.

Maryland Regional Crop Reports: April 2025

Western Maryland

Weather has been different in 2025 for sure here in Washington County. We had some of the lowest temperatures for some years and the longest sustained cold spell in recent memory. Hopefully this will help break some insect and disease cycles. Additionally, the snow was good ground water recharge although not as much as we would have liked. Then came the dry weather. The later part of winter and early spring has been unseasonably dry if we can even use that phrase anymore. Recent showers and projected precipitation has raised our hopes again for a good crop year, even if the only activity to date has been fertilizer and manure application. Planters are being tuned up and farmers are practicing their patience waiting for soil temperatures to raise.—Jeff Semler, Washington Co.

Central Maryland

Temperatures have been all over the place. It was 80 degrees a few weekends ago, and this morning it was 29 degrees. Temperatures are predicted to be a bit more spring-like over the next week and a half. Recent rains have made small grains and cover crops look better. We are still in a drought. Nitrogen and herbicide applications have gone out on wheat and barley. In eastern Montgomery County, wheat is at Feekes 5 (leaf strongly erected).—Kelly Nichols, Montgomery Co.

Northern Maryland

The theme for this winter has been cold and dry. We did get a few significant snow storms, but we are still very dry—recent rains are contributing to some good topsoil moisture at the moment. Hay and pastures look very good. Small grains did not tiller very much in the fall but have greened up and look decent and the second shot of nitrogen will be going on in the next week or so. Temperatures have dropped back into the 30s and 40s this week and soil temperatures are still running about 5 degrees cooler than normal. In a normal year there would be planters hitting the fields in the next few days for a few early plant fields, but not this year—we are still a couple of weeks from that.—Andy Kness, Harford Co.

Upper & Mid Shore

No report this month.

Lower Eastern Shore

Spring has sprung but the ground is still cold and wet. Farmers have been able to get into the fields to apply manure, and most manure application is done. Some fields are being tilled. The first spray of spring nitrogen is being applied to wheat. Cover crops are still growing on the majority of fields, although termination has begun. Corn and soybean planting has not started due to wet and cold soil conditions.—Sarah Hirsh, Somerset Co.

Southern Maryland

Farmers are preparing for planting. Everyone is busy spreading litter/manure, applying herbicides and completing field operations before planting commences. The region received some much-needed rains over the last two weeks with more anticipated this weekend. Field temperatures are still a little cool for planting with the cold front moving through this week driving temperatures lower. I suspect most planters will hit the field next week when temperatures warm again. Burndown of annual ryegrass continue to be a challenge.  Small grain crops are at jointing stage. Most of the second N applications are being made now. Alfalfa fields are a but earlier than normal with first cutting coming up soon. Alfalfa weevil is active. Hay fields have greened up nicely. We have struggled with fall planted cool season grasses across the region. Stands did not establish due to the dry fall and annual weeds are plentiful without the competition.—Ben Beale, St. Mary’s Co.

*Regions (counties):
Western: Garrett, Allegany, Washington. Central: Frederick, Montgomery, Howard. Northern: Harford, Baltimore, Carroll. Upper & Mid Shore: Cecil, Kent, Caroline, Queen Anne, Talbot. Lower Shore: Dorchester, Somerset, Wicomico. Southern: St. Mary’s, Anne Arundel, Charles, Calvert, Prince George’s

April 2025 Grain Market Report

Dale Johnson, Farm Management Specialist | dmj@umd.edu
University of Maryland Extension

Corn

This month’s 2024/25 U.S. corn outlook is for greater exports, reduced feed and residual use, and smaller ending stocks. Feed and residual use is cut 25 million bushels to 5.75 billion based on disappearance during the December-February quarter as indicated in the March 31 Grain Stocks report. Exports are raised 100 million bushels reflecting the pace of sales and shipments to date and relatively competitive U.S. prices. With no other use changes, ending stocks are down 75 million bushels from last month to 1.5 billion. The season-average corn price received by producers is unchanged at $4.35 per bushel. 

Soybeans

The outlook for U.S. soybean supply and use for 2024/25 includes higher imports and crush, and lower ending stocks. Soybean crush is raised 10 million bushels to 4.42 billion on higher soybean meal domestic use and soybean oil exports. Soybean oil exports are increased based on export commitments. Soybean oil for biofuel is lowered based on pace to date. However, stronger use is forecast for the last part of the marketing year due to tariffs impacting imports of other biofuel feedstocks, like used cooking oil. With soybean exports unchanged and imports increased slightly, soybean ending stocks are lowered 5 million bushels to 375 million.

Wheat

This month’s supply and demand outlook for 2024/25 U.S. wheat is for larger supplies, slightly smaller domestic use, reduced exports, and increased ending stocks. Supplies are raised on higher projected imports, up 10 million bushels to 150 million, with increases for Hard Red Spring (HRS), Durum, White, and Hard Red Winter (HRW). At this level, imports would be the largest since 2017/18. Domestic consumption is forecast 2 million bushels lower on reduced seed use, based primarily on the March NASS Prospective Plantings report. Feed and residual use is unchanged at 120 million bushels, but there are offsetting by-class revisions based on the March 31 NASS Grain Stocks report. Exports are lowered 15 million bushels to 820 million with reductions to HRS and HRW. Projected 2024/25 ending stocks are raised 27 million bushels to 846 million, 22 percent above the previous year. The season average farm price is unchanged at $5.50 per bushel. 

University of Maryland Extension Looking to Scout Your Late Season Cover Crops! 

Emily Zobel, Senior Agriculture Agent Associate | ezobel@umd.edu
University of Maryland Extension, Dorchester County

University of Maryland Extension is in its second year of a Maryland Soybean Board-funded research project investigating what insects may be using late-season cover crops as overwintering habitats and what that means for the following cash crop. We are looking for cover crop fields to scout on the Eastern Shore of Maryland, which will not be terminated until the end of April or May. If you have a field/fields you’d like us to scout or for more information, please contact Emily Zobel by email at ezobel@umd.edu or by phone at (410) 228-8800. Thank you to the Maryland Soybean Board for funding this research project.

University of Maryland Researchers Encourage Farmers to Participate in TAPS program

Researchers at the University of Maryland are inviting growers across the state to participate in their University of Maryland – Testing Ag Performance Solutions (UMD-TAPS) program this year. The program is supported by the Maryland Soybean Board and will run throughout the summer.

Piloted at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, the TAPS program provides farmers with a zero-risk opportunity to advance their agricultural management skills and knowledge. It serves as a growing season contest and research framework, designed to uncover how producers’ management decisions drive crop yields, farm profitability, and input-use efficiency.

Growers must make decisions about variety selection, fertility, pest management, and irrigation and their management decisions will be executed in small plots at the Wye Research and Education Center. Decisions made by all participants will be executed in one field, in a true head-to-head competition. The goal is to identify which suite of management decisions will become the most profitable, efficient, and highest yielding.

Researchers at the Maryland Agricultural Experimentation Station (MAES) WYE Research and Education Center will lead the program and gather data on each plot to share with farmers.

When the season ends, growers will participate in an awards dinner where they will gain access to valuable data sets to help them enhance their agricultural operations.

The irrigated corn competition is limited to 20 teams and the irrigated soybean competition is limited to 15 teams. Due to limited availability, researchers urge teams to sign up as soon as possible.

Interested applicants can sign up by following this link: bit.ly/UMDTAPS25. For any questions, please reach out to Dr. Nicole Fiorellino at nfiorell@umd.edu.

ESA and The Pesticide Strategies

ESA and The Pesticide Strategies

What Do All of Us Need To Know?

What:       Pesticide labeling is changing to incorporate protections for Endangered and Threatened species.  Only recently have labeled herbicides addressed ESA, but as additional herbicides are labeled and existing herbicides are re-registered, these changes will be more common. This meeting will address how these changes will impact pesticide applications and discuss what needs to be considered when selecting specific pesticides.

Date:   March 13, Thursday

Where:       Where: Maryland Department of Agriculture

                    50 Harry S Truman ParkwayAnnapolis, MD 21401

Organizers:   Niranjana Krishnan, Univ Maryland, Entomologist

            Bill Chism, WSSA, Chair of ESA Committee

            Kurt Vollmer, Univ. Maryland, Weed Scientist       

            Mark VanGessel, Univ Delaware, Weed Scientist

Time:  9:00 to 1:00 pm, meeting includes lunch

Objectives

i.Provide background on ESA

ii.How end users will use “the strategies” when making pesticides decisions

iii.Improve the training materials for a wider audience.

Topics:   

OrderTopicTime
1Background on ESA9:00
2Herbicide Strategy9:20
3Insecticide Strategy (draft) – what differs from Herbicide strategy9:35
4National Marine Fisheries Service – points are different and will this change?9:50
5State Regulators, DE & MD10:00
6Spray drift and calculations10:20
Break10:45
7Runoff/Erosion Mitigation calculations and calculator11:00
8Bulletins Live! Two go through an example11:25
9Example calculations from their own fields and report on the experience11:40
10Lunch12:20
11What can we do to improve the training?12:50

Credits are available for Delaware and Maryland pesticide applicator credits (MD: 8 credits),

Certified Crop Advisor credits (1.5 Soil and Water Management; 1 Integrated Pest Management) and NAICC (4.5 CEU credits).

In order to achieve Objective iii (improving training materials) we will be recording the presentations

Please Register

THERE IS NO COST, but we ask that you pre-register at: https://forms.gle/hZU2pFxmEnh6i7EA9

UMD Grain Marketing Site Updated for 2025

Shannon Dill, Principal Agriculture Agent

University of Maryland Extension

Elizabeth Thilmany, Faculty Specialist

University of Maryland, Agriculture Law Education Initiative

The University of Maryland Extension has updated www.go.umd.edu/grainmarketing site with custom rates, field crop budgets, and a new online tool for grain marketing analysis.

Custom Rates

A mail and online survey conducted in the Fall of 2024 gathered custom work charge data from 61 operators and farmers across Maryland and Delaware. Custom rates refer to the fees charged for various agricultural field operations performed and often include services such as planting, tillage, harvesting, spraying, and manure application. These rates provide a valuable resource for determining fair pricing when other benchmarks are unavailable.

The report summarizes the range, average, and median rates for custom services, offering insights into cost trends. Comparisons with past surveys from 2023, 2021, 2019, and 2017 highlight rate changes over time.

Variations in charges stem from factors such as location, field conditions, equipment type, and service timeliness. Some rates have been excluded due to insufficient responses.

Overall farm production costs are expected to rise 5% in 2025 compared to 2023. The most significant rise is in field preparation, which is expected to jump 16%.

Key Cost Increases:

  • Field Preparation: Projected to rise 16%, from $20 to $24.
  • Planting Costs: Estimated to grow 14%, reaching $25
  • Grass and Hay Production: Expected to increase by 15%, from $15 to $18
  • Labor Costs: Rising 11%, from $42 to $47
  • Field Applications: Experiencing a modest 8% increase, from $14 to $15
  • Harvesting: Expected to increase from $73 in 2023 to $86 in 2025 (15%)
  • Equipment Costs Decline: The only area expected to see a cost reduction is equipment expenses, which are reported to drop by 19%, from $85 to $71.

Crop Budgets

Cost of production is very important when making decisions related to your farm enterprise and grain marketing. Surveys from 2024 UME Winter Crop Production meetings report 66% of farmers believe input costs are the greatest challenges facing their farm operation. Enterprise budgets provide valuable information regarding individual enterprises on the farm. This tool enables farm managers to make decisions regarding enterprises and plan for the coming production year. An enterprise budget uses farm revenue, variable cost, fixed cost, and net income to provide a clear picture of the financial health of each farm enterprise.

The 2025 Maryland enterprise budgets were developed using average yields and estimated input costs based on producer and farm supplier data. Fertilizer prices, pesticide availability, and fuel expenses have fluctuated greatly. The figures presented are averages and vary greatly from one farm and region to the other. It is, therefore, crucial to input actual farm data when completing enterprise budgets for your farm.

The latest cost per acre comparison from 2024 and 2025 reveals shifts in input costs and market conditions affecting farmers. Overall, there is a slight decrease in costs from 2024. The cost of production per acre for Corn – No Till is projected to decrease from $690 in 2024 to $655 in 2025, marking a 5% decline. Similarly, Corn – Conventional is expected to see a 2% decrease, dropping from $749 to $731 per acre. Conversely, Soybeans are expected to experience a 5% cost increase, rising from $410 per acre in 2024 to $431 in 2025. The most significant decrease is seen in Wheat, where costs are projected to decline by 6%, from $514 per acre in 2024 to $481 in 2025.  

How to Use University Enterprise Budgets:

The enterprise budgets can be used as a baseline for your operation, and you can modify these budgets to include your production techniques, inputs, and overall management. The budgets are available electronically in PDF, Excel, and now as an interactive website at go.umd.edu/efmd. Use this document as a start or reference to create your crop budgets. Contact information is on the website if you have problems downloading any information.

Cost per acre for selected crops

New Grain Marketing Tool 

To assist farmers in making crop enterprise decisions, UMD has introduced the Maryland Grain Budget Planner, a new online tool that integrates crop budget data with grain marketing analysis. This free resource, funded by the Northeast Extension Risk Management Education Center, helps farmers track market trends, project expenses, and benchmark financial performance. By using this tool, producers can make more informed decisions about the cost of production, marketing strategies, and overall farm profitability. The tool includes a Market Analysis tab, which provides historical pricing data and cost trends. Below is an example of estimated crop income per bushel from the Market Analysis tab:

This tool can be accessed at go.umd.edu/EFMD

2024 Soybean & Corn Pest Management Survey

Farmers and crop consultants are encouraged to complete this survey

This survey is intended to estimate the impact of pests on soybeans and currently used management strategies. Your perspective is valuable in making these estimates as accurate as possible. Your responses will be kept confidential and only aggregated responses for the state will be published. You can find last year’s estimates at https://midsouthentomologist.org.msstate.edu/Volume17/Vol-17-1_TOC.html.

The survey can be completed online at https://delaware.ca1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_8GnhiHa4rn9ToPP or by following the QR code. If you have any questions, please contact us by email or phone. We look forward to hearing from you.

Local Contact: David Owens, University of Delaware     

Email:            owensd@udel.edu                  bcsam@udel.edu        

Phone:            C: (302) 698-7125        

Local Contact: Kelly Hamby, University of Maryland

Email:       kahamby@umd.edu

Phone:      C: (925) 354 0483