When Undergraduates Meet Journal Articles

Getting undergraduates to read academic journal articles can be a daunting task.

J_headshot

Post by: Chelona RSA Exec. Board Member, Jaclyn Bruner

Even in upper level classes, if you aren’t careful with how and when you assign the more challenging reading assignments – even a good professor can stoke the fires of a revolt. As the instructor, you know you think the reading is interesting and that the author makes good points, but how can you know if your students will engage with the readings enough to make it worthwhile?

 

When I was an undergraduate, my rhetoric classes were small, seminar style classes. And guess what – the majority of the readings were journal articles. I loved classes where I didn’t have to buy a textbook and where I got to read things that challenged my perspective on the world.

Now that I am the one in front of a classroom, one course in particular stands out to me. I took “Public Memory” with Brad Vivian… and he practically threw us into the deep-end. My classmates would moan and complain about the reading load, and I would nod along with them, acting as though the journal articles were long and boring to me, too – all the while, keeping my gratitude for the challenging readings to myself.

Of course, in class Dr. Vivian would walk us through the articles, pointing out different ways to engage with the Vietnam Veteran’s Memorial or explaining the concentric circles of Edward Casey’s public, collective, social, or individual memory. He would ask us if we bought the argument, what could have made it stronger, or to elaborate on something that really stuck out to us. I didn’t know it at the time, but these were some of the most formative elements of my graduate career, both as a student and as a teacher.

In that class, I learned to love the way that rhetorical criticism shone a light on specific texts. I was taught to evaluate authors’ arguments and problematize their claims. I gained confidence in understanding and critically engaging the world around me.

As I step back into the classroom this week, I have re-worked my syllabus to include academic journal articles as a part of the assigned readings. I have brought them into the classroom in the past, but only as in-class activities. This spring, I have upped the ante, and I am challenging my students to engage with the articles on their own.

So for the first two weeks, I plan to bring excerpts of journal articles into our classroom as group activities.

To keep students engaged when they are responsible for reading the articles later in the semester though, I want to use these early in-class activities to provide them tools for reading academic articles. I believe these tools can aid in developing an understanding of the complex arguments presented in academic articles. A method that has been working well for me (both in basic and upper-level courses) requires teaching the “Four Things” to look for when reading a journal article:

1) Research Questions/Argument,
2) Text,
3) Historical Info/Context, and
4) Scholarship.

In other words:

What is the author saying?
What is s/he studying?
What does the audience need to know?
Who else writes about these things?

I believe that equipping my students with these questions will help to eliminate some of the frustration that comes with trying to read and understand an academic article when preparing for class. By the end of the semester, my students will be reading a speech and a criticism of that speech, in addition to producing their own rhetorical criticism of a text they select.

In the meantime, for these early days of the semester, if a student comes to class willing to engage with the readings and ready to learn, I think the semester will turn out just fine!

Look out Atlanta!

Cheló̱naRSA will be well represented in Atlanta, Georgia at the 17th Biennial Rhetoric Society of America Conference this summer!

RSA Rhetoric & Change Logo

Across our English and Communication departments, 13 of our Cheló̱naRSA members (and one amazing Faculty Sponsor!) will be presenting accepted papers at the conference. We are very proud to be representing Maryland with such strong scholarly work across the board.

Congratulations, again, to all our Maryland RSA Participants:


Rebecca Alt

“Vico’s ‘Ingenious Orator’: Toward a Theory of Imaginative Reasoning for Social Change”

“Identification and “Identity Psychosis”: the Rhetorical Failure of Burke’s “Perfect Scapegoat”


Jaclyn Bruner

“Reacting to Change: The Supreme Court, The Newseum, and the Public”


Megan Fitzmaurice

“Avenging the Ancestors: The Rhetorical Reimagination of Washington at The President’s House”

“Legacy for Sale: The Rosa Parks Papers and the Rhetoric of Commodification”


Elizabeth Gardner

“Children Campaigning: Night Messenger Boys on Strike”


Kim Hannah

“Same Song, Second Verse: Hillary Clinton, Jeb Bush, and the Rhetorical Reconstruction of Political Dynasties”


Lauren Hunter

“Coloring Between the Lines: Rhetorical Criticism of the National Association of Black Social Workers’ 1968 Position Statement”


Kristy Maddux

“Exposing Women: Deliberative Democracy at the World’s Columbian Exposition, 1893”


Thomas McCloskey

“Failed Campaigns as Opportune Moments: Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Kairos”


Cameron Mozafari

“Toward a Cognitive Rhetoric of Emotions: A Corpus Approach”


Annie Laurie Nichols

“I Am Black, Therefore I Am”: Stokely Carmichael’s Multiple Identification

Ethnographic Listening as Rhetorical Action


Jade Olson

“Presenting the White Paper: Whither Social Movement in Rhetorical Studies?”


Ruth Osorio

“Forty Weeks of Change: Embodied Rhetorics, Pregnancy, and Shifting Strategies of Disclosure.


Yvonne Slosarski

“The President’s Commission on the Status of Women: Negotiating Labor Feminism in the Cold War Context.”


Meridith Styer

“Reconsidering the “City on a Hill”: Examining Rhetorical Moments of Change in Puritan New England”


Spring 2016 Reading Group

Join us for our first Cheló̱na RSA Reading Group!

facebook logo red

Check out the reading group info on Facebook!

On four different meeting dates in the spring 2016 semester, this group will read articles that represent the “state of the discipline.”

We will be determining the meeting dates based on the results of when members are available. If you want to join us, fill out your availability!

Drawing from top journals in rhetoric — both composition and communication — this group is sure to have engaging discussions that unite us as rhetoricians in both English and communication.

Join us for one meeting, all four, or anything in between! Any rhetorically inclined faculty, students, members, and non-members are invited. Spread the word!

 

Readings:
Quarterly Journal of Speech: Jenkins (2014): Models of visual rhetoric.

Rhetoric Society Quarterly: Gunn & McPhall (2015): Coming home to roost: Jeremiah Wright, Barack Obama, and the (re)signing of (post) racial rhetoric.

Rhetoric & Public Affairs: Winslow (2015): The undeserving professor: Neoliberalism and the reinvention of higher education.

*Author Attending*
College English: Ceraso (2015): (Re)Educating the senses: Multimodal listening, bodily learning, and the composition of sonic experiences.

 

*Please Note*
The date of this Facebook event is set to the final week of possible meeting times. Each of the four meeting dates will be determined via the poll, ranging from early February to the end of April.

Welcome!

Welcome to the official page of Cheló̱na RSA!

We are the University of Maryland’s graduate student chapter of the Rhetoric Society of America. Cheló̱na (the Greek, χελώνα) means “turtle.” Terp pride!

RSA is dedicated to bringing scholars of rhetoric together across traditional university and field boundaries, and it is our mission to do the same at Maryland.

Why is this important? At the Biennial RSA Institute last June, the joint-keynote speakers emphasized this message: Inter-, Intra-, or Trans- disciplinarity encourages the most fruitful academic conversations. The speakers jokingly lamented that Communication rhetoricians and English rhetoricians “don’t understand each other.” The truth of that statement reinforces the exigence for RSA, and consequently, university student chapters that support the future academics in the field of rhetoric.

Along with our parent organization, we strive to make scholarly and pedagogical collaboration between Comm and English rhetoricians not only possible, but regular. Through various programs, workshops, colloquia, and other initiatives, we hope to foster an academic climate in rhetoric that supports the interests, needs, and desires of our graduate students at Maryland.

Our mission is not solely about enriching our own experiences. Cheló̱na RSA also recognizes the number of undergraduate students at the University of Maryland who are interested in studying rhetoric now and possibly later in graduate education. These are our students, and their ideas, issues, and needs matter to us. We seek to support them through mentoring programs and by providing opportunities for their academic growth and advancement.

We also hope to engage in the wider scholarly and civic communities we are a part of. Our Conferences and Rhetorical Community Activism committees ensure that our members are taking advantage of opportunities to attend national, regional, and local conferences as well as opportunities to serve our university community and the neighborhoods in which we live and work.

Members of Cheló̱na RSA have a shared belief in not only the work we do as professionals, but the manner in which we do that work. Crossing arbitrary disciplinary and university boundaries demonstrates the commitment to meaningful scholarship, valuable networking, and collegiality.

We hope to continue this work for many years to come at the University of Maryland.

Rebecca Alt
2015/2016 President