Coronavirus Food Assistance Program (CFAP): What Beef Producers Need to Know

Dr. Sarah Potts, Dairy & Beef Specialist
University of Maryland Extension

Background:
The USDA CFAP Program has allocated $16 billion in funds for direct payments to farmers to help with the fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic. The funds are derived from two sources: the Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act and the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) Charter Act. Funds from the CARES Act are meant to help farmers cope with price reductions incurred between mid-January and mid-April while funds from the CCC Charter Act are meant to help farmers cope with market disruptions.

Eligibility:
All producers who incurred a 5% or greater reduction in commodity prices due to the COVID-19 pandemic are eligible to apply for aid. If more than 75% of an applicant’s income is from farming, there are no gross income restrictions. However, if less than 75% of income is derived from non-farming sources, the average adjusted gross income on the applicant’s 2016, 2017, and 2018 tax returns must be less than $900,000. Participation in risk management programs, such as the Dairy Margin Coverage Program, and Small Business Administration (SBA) programs, such as the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), do not affect a producer’s eligibility for CFAP aid.

Funding Limitations:
Individual producers or farms are eligible for up to $250,000 of aid. However, if your farm business is structured as a Corporation, Limited Liability Company, Limited Partnership, etc., you may be entitled to a higher limit of up to $750,000 depending on the number of shareholders who contribute more than 400 hours of labor annually to the farm business.

Applications and Payments:
The application period begins on Tuesday, May 26th and goes through August 28th, 2020. Producers must call their local Farm Service Agency (FSA) office in order to schedule an appointment to complete the application process. Producers will receive 80% of their payment as soon as their application is completed and processed. The remaining 20% of their payment will be dispersed at a later date, as funds are available.

A payment estimate calculator and other resources will be made available at https://www.farmers.gov/cfap beginning May 26th to help farmers estimate the amount of aid they should receive.

Beef producers are eligible to apply for aid based on the number of cattle marketed between January 15 and April 15, 2020 (CARES Act payments; column 1 in Table 1) and the greatest number of cattle on inventory between April 16 and May 14, 2020 (CCC Charter Act payments; column 2 in Table 1). Payment rates vary depending on the type of cattle sold or in inventory during these time periods.

Table 1. CFAP Payment Structure Based on Cattle Class.

CFAP Payment Rates for Different Cattle Classes.
*The “All Other Cattle” class excludes those cattle that are intended or raised for dairy purposes.

Example:
A beef producer applies for aid as an individual. She sold a total of 3 cull cows and 20 feeder cattle (<600 lb) between January 15 and April 15. From April 16 to May 14, she managed 30 cow/calf pairs, 1 mature breeding bull, and 3 feeder cattle (>600 lb) that she intends to finish out and sell as freezer beef.

This producer should be eligible for up to $250,000 of aid because she is applying as an individual. The total maximum payment she can expect is calculated as follows:

CARES Act Funds (column 1): $2,316

  • $276 for the 3 cull cows sold: $92/head × 3 head
  • $2,040 for the 20 feeder calves (<600 lb) sold: $102/head × 20 head

CCC Charter Act Funds (column 2): $2,112

  • $1,980 for the 30 cow/calf pairs: 30 cows + 30 calves = 60 head × $33/head
  • $33 for the breeding bull: 1 bull × $33/head
  • $99 for the 3 feeder cattle (>600 lb): 3 head × $33/head

This producer is expected to receive a maximum payment of $4,428. The initial payment this producer can expect to receive is $3,542.40 (80% of $4,428).

For additional information, visit https://www.farmers.gov/cfap or contact your local FSA office.

Optimizing Drying for Hay and Haylage

Dr. Amanda Grev, Pasture & Forage Specialist
University of Maryland Extension

Along with making corn and soybean planting a challenge, spring rains make for a challenging
forage harvest as well. The faster we can get our hay or haylage dry enough to bale or wrap,
the more we can reduce the risk of rain damage and retain a higher quality end product. Follow
these guidelines to help optimize drying time during forage harvest this spring.

The Forage Drying Process
Let’s think for a moment about the basic principles behind forage drying. When forage is cut, it
is around 75 to 80% moisture but it must be dried down to 60 to 65% moisture for haylage or
14 to 18% moisture for dry hay. During this wilting and drying process, plants continue the
natural process of respiration, breaking down stored sugars to create energy and carbon
dioxide. The longer it takes the forage to dry, the longer the forage continues to respire in the
field. Data suggests that 2 to 8% of the dry matter may be lost due to respiration, resulting in
energy losses and an overall reduction in forage quality. This means that a faster drying time
will not only get the forage off the field faster but will also lower the amount of dry matter and
nutrients lost through respiration.

The drying process happens in several distinct phases; knowing and understanding these
phases can help us manage our forage in a way that will maximize drying rates and ensure
nutrient retention within the harvested forage.

Phase One: Moisture Loss via Stomatal Openings
The first phase in the drying process is moisture loss from the leaves. This happens through the
stomata, which are the openings in the leaf surface that allow for moisture and gas exchange
between the leaf and the outside air. These stomata are naturally open in daylight and closed
in darkness. After a plant is cut, respiration continues but gradually declines until the moisture
content has fallen below 60%. Rapid drying in this initial phase to lose the first 15 to 20%
moisture will reduce loss of starch and sugar and preserve more dry matter and total digestible
nutrients in the harvested forage.

Solar radiation is the key to maximizing drying during this initial phase. This can be
accomplished by using a wide swath (at least 70% of the cut area), which will maximize the
amount of forage exposed to sunlight. A wider swath will increase the swath temperature,
reduce the swath humidity, and keep the stomata open to allow for moisture loss, encouraging
rapid and more even drying immediately after cutting. In contrast, narrow windrows will have
higher humidity and less drying, allowing respiration to continue and leading to further dry
matter and nutrient losses. Research has shown that a wide swath immediately after cutting is
the single most important factor in maximizing the initial drying rate and preserving digestible
dry matter. A full width swath will increase the drying surface of the swath by 2.8 times, and moisture reductions from 85 to 60% can be reached in as little as 5 to 7 hours. Haylage from
wide swaths has been shown to have lower respiration losses during drying, greater total
digestible nutrients, and more lactic and acetic acid, improving forage quality and fermentation.
During this phase, a wide swath is more important than conditioning as most of the respiration
takes place in the leaves. While conditioning is important for drying stems, it has less impact on
drying leaves and therefore will have little effect on this initial moisture loss. This means that
for haylage, a wide swath may be more important than conditioning.

Phase Two: Stem Moisture Loss
The second phase in the drying process includes moisture loss from the stems in addition to the
leaves. Once moisture levels have dropped to the point where plant respiration ceases, the
closing of the stomata traps the remaining moisture, slowing further drying. At this stage,
conditioning can help increase the drying rate because it provides openings within the plant’s
structure, providing an exit path for moisture and allowing drying to continue at a faster rate.
For maximum effectiveness, be sure the conditioner is adjusted properly based on the stem
thickness (roughly 5% of leaves showing some bruising) and choose the best conditioner based
on your forage type. For example, roller conditioners are often preferred for alfalfa due to
reduced leaf loss.

Phase Three: Loss of Tightly Held Water
The final phase of the drying process is the loss of tightly held water, particularly from the
stems. Stems generally have a lower surface to volume ratio, fewer stomata, and a semi-
impervious waxy cuticle that minimizes water loss so conditioning is critical to enhance drying
during this phase.

Additional Factors
In addition to swath width and conditioning, several other strategies can be used to improve
drying time. Be sure to cut forages at the proper height, leaving 2 to 3 inches for alfalfa and 4
inches for cool-season grasses. Not only will this result in improved stand persistence, earlier
regrowth, and sooner subsequent cuttings, but the stubble will help to elevate the swath and
promote air flow and rapid drying. If possible, mow earlier in the day, preferably mid- to late-
morning after the dew has dried off. This will allow for a full day of drying right away,
maximizing exposure to sunlight and resulting in a faster drop in moisture and reduced
respiration. And finally, raking should occur when the forage is above 40% moisture. Raking
the forage while it is still pliable helps to reduce leaf loss and maintain forage quality. Adjust
the rake to minimize the amount of tines touching the ground to avoid soil contamination.

In conclusion, cutting in the morning and using wide swaths to take advantage of sunlight is key
to both faster drying and preserving digestible dry matter. Remember, a wide swath enhances
leaf drying while conditioning expedites stem drying; both are needed to make high quality hay.