GRAIN FEEDING CATTLE IN SOUTHERN MARYLAND

6-9 pm | Dinner provided

Agenda:
Southern Maryland Grain Update 
Ben Beale, Univeristy of Maryland Extension

Becoming a cooperator herd with Roseda Beef
Dean Bryant, Roseda Beef

Current opportunities in feeding cattle and the basics of cattle diets
Charlie Sasscer III, University of Maryland Extension

Locations:
September 6, 2023 | Calvert County
901 Dares Beach Rd., Prince Frederick, MD 20678

September 13, 2023 | The Barns at New Market
29133 Thompson Corner Rd., Charlotte Hall, MD 20659

RSVP at https://forms.gle/s4hpojx69TSnhTPW8

New Maryland Extension Livestock Newsletter

The University of Maryland Extension Livestock Team recently published the first issue of its new newsletter, “Cattle Tales Livestock Newsletter“.  This newsletter will bring Maryland’s producers timely information related to a variety of livestock species.  The newsletter will be made available on a quarterly basis and archived issues can be accessed at the following link: https://go.umd.edu/beef-cattle-resources.

If you’d like to subscribe to the newsletter, please fill in your email address using the following link: https://go.umd.edu/subscribe-livestock-newsletter.

Coronavirus Food Assistance Program 2 for Livestock Producers

What do beef cattle, buffalo and alpaca all have in common? They are all eligible for USDA’s Coronavirus Food Assistance Program 2 (CFAP 2). If you commercially raise animals for food, fur, fiber, or feathers, you may be eligible for assistance. Check to see if you raise eligible livestock through our Eligible Commodities Finder on farmers.gov/cfap.

USDA’s Farm Service Agency will accept CFAP 2 applications through December 11, 2020.

Learn more at farmers.gov/cfap or call 877-508-8364 to speak directly with a USDA employee ready to offer assistance.

Watch the video

Are Your Cattle Cool? Tips for Managing the Summer Heat

Dr. Sarah Potts, Dairy & Beef Specialist
University of Maryland Extension

With temperatures well into the 90s during and heat indices as high as 107°F during these last couple weeks, there’s no doubt that the summer heat has arrived.  Making adjustments to management and/or housing of both beef and dairy cattle is crucial to minimizing the negative health and production impacts of heat stress.

Importance of Managing Heat Stress

There is no question that heat stress can negatively impact animal performance.  Exposure to heat stress reduces daily gains, milk production, and reproductive efficiency, though specific impacts on production varies depending on the magnitude and duration of heat exposure.  Prolonged exposure to heat stress is much more detrimental than short-term heat stress and its effects linger long after temperatures drop back below the heat stress threshold.  For example, it can take up to 5 weeks for a breeding bull to recover sperm quality after a bout of mild to moderate heat stress.  Exposure to heat stress also reduces oocyte quality and embryo viability, and thus, negatively impacts fertility of the cow.  In addition to its effects on fertility, recent studies also indicate that prolonged exposure to heat stress during gestation can have negative, long-lasting impacts on calf performance.  A recent study in dairy cattle showed that dairy heifers born to dams exposed to heat stress during the last 2 months of pregnancy were smaller, had a reduced productive life by 5 months, and produced an average of 8 lb/d less during their first 3 lactations than those born to dams who were cooled during the last 2 months of pregnancy.  Thus, the value of managing heat stress supersedes the obvious advantages associated with fertility, milk production, and growth.

Signs of Heat Stress in Cattle

Livestock producers often utilize the Temperature Humidity Index (THI) to assess risk for heat stress, which takes into account both the environmental temperature and humidity.  Historically, the gold standard THI threshold for heat stress in cattle is 72.  However, recent studies suggest that for high producing dairy cows, the THI threshold should be closer to 68.

Generally, cattle that are heat stressed will exhibit increased respiration rate and standing behavior, reduced feed intake, and an increase in shade-seeking behaviors.  According to the USDA Animal Research Service’s Meat Animal Research Center (MARC), there are six stages of heat stress in cattle which can be identified by various behaviors.  Cattle in Stage 6 require immediate attention.

How to Reduce Heat Stress

While there’s a good chance that cattle in our region will experience some degree of heat stress during the summer months, producers should try to reduce the extent and duration of heat stress exposure by making adjustments to their management and housing strategies.

Avoid working animals during the day.  Schedule transportation or other activities for early in the morning (preferred) or late in the evening.  Any stressful events, such as vaccination, weaning, or dehorning should be rescheduled if there is an impending heat wave.

Ensure ample access to fresh, clean water.  Water is required for all animals to maintain body temperature and under normal conditions, a high producing dairy cow will drink up to 50 gallons of water per day, while a beef cow will drink up to 15 gallons per day.  Heat stress may cause cattle to increase their water intake up to 50%.  Waterers should be installed in areas that are easily accessible for cattle and flow rate should be sufficient to support increased water demand.  For dairy cattle, a waterer should be located near the exit of the milking parlor.

Provide shade.  This is most basic component of heat abatement and should be provided for all cattle during high temperatures.  For confined cattle, this is often in the form of a barn, shed, or shade cloth.  Producers with cattle on pasture often rely on natural shade provided by trees. These producers may also consider providing access to a sacrifice area with man made shade during the day and pasture turn-out at night.

Ensure adequate ventilation.  Poor ventilation is often an issue inside barns or other man made structures.  These facilities should be opened up as much as possible to promote natural airflow by opening side curtains, windows, etc.  Fans should also be installed in key areas, such as the feed bunk, over the free-stalls or bedded pack, and holding pen (dairy) to promote airflow.

Consider cooling with water only after there is shade and adequate ventilation.  To be effective, this heat abatement strategy must be paired with sufficient airflow or fans to promote evaporative cooling.  Simply soaking cattle without adequate airflow will only succeed in creating a more humid environment around the animals.  Sprinklers/misters can be strategically placed at the feed bunk and the holding pen (dairy) for optimal cooling.

Coronavirus Food Assistance Program (CFAP): What Beef Producers Need to Know

Dr. Sarah Potts, Dairy & Beef Specialist
University of Maryland Extension

Background:
The USDA CFAP Program has allocated $16 billion in funds for direct payments to farmers to help with the fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic. The funds are derived from two sources: the Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act and the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) Charter Act. Funds from the CARES Act are meant to help farmers cope with price reductions incurred between mid-January and mid-April while funds from the CCC Charter Act are meant to help farmers cope with market disruptions.

Eligibility:
All producers who incurred a 5% or greater reduction in commodity prices due to the COVID-19 pandemic are eligible to apply for aid. If more than 75% of an applicant’s income is from farming, there are no gross income restrictions. However, if less than 75% of income is derived from non-farming sources, the average adjusted gross income on the applicant’s 2016, 2017, and 2018 tax returns must be less than $900,000. Participation in risk management programs, such as the Dairy Margin Coverage Program, and Small Business Administration (SBA) programs, such as the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), do not affect a producer’s eligibility for CFAP aid.

Funding Limitations:
Individual producers or farms are eligible for up to $250,000 of aid. However, if your farm business is structured as a Corporation, Limited Liability Company, Limited Partnership, etc., you may be entitled to a higher limit of up to $750,000 depending on the number of shareholders who contribute more than 400 hours of labor annually to the farm business.

Applications and Payments:
The application period begins on Tuesday, May 26th and goes through August 28th, 2020. Producers must call their local Farm Service Agency (FSA) office in order to schedule an appointment to complete the application process. Producers will receive 80% of their payment as soon as their application is completed and processed. The remaining 20% of their payment will be dispersed at a later date, as funds are available.

A payment estimate calculator and other resources will be made available at https://www.farmers.gov/cfap beginning May 26th to help farmers estimate the amount of aid they should receive.

Beef producers are eligible to apply for aid based on the number of cattle marketed between January 15 and April 15, 2020 (CARES Act payments; column 1 in Table 1) and the greatest number of cattle on inventory between April 16 and May 14, 2020 (CCC Charter Act payments; column 2 in Table 1). Payment rates vary depending on the type of cattle sold or in inventory during these time periods.

Table 1. CFAP Payment Structure Based on Cattle Class.

CFAP Payment Rates for Different Cattle Classes.
*The “All Other Cattle” class excludes those cattle that are intended or raised for dairy purposes.

Example:
A beef producer applies for aid as an individual. She sold a total of 3 cull cows and 20 feeder cattle (<600 lb) between January 15 and April 15. From April 16 to May 14, she managed 30 cow/calf pairs, 1 mature breeding bull, and 3 feeder cattle (>600 lb) that she intends to finish out and sell as freezer beef.

This producer should be eligible for up to $250,000 of aid because she is applying as an individual. The total maximum payment she can expect is calculated as follows:

CARES Act Funds (column 1): $2,316

  • $276 for the 3 cull cows sold: $92/head × 3 head
  • $2,040 for the 20 feeder calves (<600 lb) sold: $102/head × 20 head

CCC Charter Act Funds (column 2): $2,112

  • $1,980 for the 30 cow/calf pairs: 30 cows + 30 calves = 60 head × $33/head
  • $33 for the breeding bull: 1 bull × $33/head
  • $99 for the 3 feeder cattle (>600 lb): 3 head × $33/head

This producer is expected to receive a maximum payment of $4,428. The initial payment this producer can expect to receive is $3,542.40 (80% of $4,428).

For additional information, visit https://www.farmers.gov/cfap or contact your local FSA office.

Optimizing Drying for Hay and Haylage

Dr. Amanda Grev, Pasture & Forage Specialist
University of Maryland Extension

Along with making corn and soybean planting a challenge, spring rains make for a challenging
forage harvest as well. The faster we can get our hay or haylage dry enough to bale or wrap,
the more we can reduce the risk of rain damage and retain a higher quality end product. Follow
these guidelines to help optimize drying time during forage harvest this spring.

The Forage Drying Process
Let’s think for a moment about the basic principles behind forage drying. When forage is cut, it
is around 75 to 80% moisture but it must be dried down to 60 to 65% moisture for haylage or
14 to 18% moisture for dry hay. During this wilting and drying process, plants continue the
natural process of respiration, breaking down stored sugars to create energy and carbon
dioxide. The longer it takes the forage to dry, the longer the forage continues to respire in the
field. Data suggests that 2 to 8% of the dry matter may be lost due to respiration, resulting in
energy losses and an overall reduction in forage quality. This means that a faster drying time
will not only get the forage off the field faster but will also lower the amount of dry matter and
nutrients lost through respiration.

The drying process happens in several distinct phases; knowing and understanding these
phases can help us manage our forage in a way that will maximize drying rates and ensure
nutrient retention within the harvested forage.

Phase One: Moisture Loss via Stomatal Openings
The first phase in the drying process is moisture loss from the leaves. This happens through the
stomata, which are the openings in the leaf surface that allow for moisture and gas exchange
between the leaf and the outside air. These stomata are naturally open in daylight and closed
in darkness. After a plant is cut, respiration continues but gradually declines until the moisture
content has fallen below 60%. Rapid drying in this initial phase to lose the first 15 to 20%
moisture will reduce loss of starch and sugar and preserve more dry matter and total digestible
nutrients in the harvested forage.

Solar radiation is the key to maximizing drying during this initial phase. This can be
accomplished by using a wide swath (at least 70% of the cut area), which will maximize the
amount of forage exposed to sunlight. A wider swath will increase the swath temperature,
reduce the swath humidity, and keep the stomata open to allow for moisture loss, encouraging
rapid and more even drying immediately after cutting. In contrast, narrow windrows will have
higher humidity and less drying, allowing respiration to continue and leading to further dry
matter and nutrient losses. Research has shown that a wide swath immediately after cutting is
the single most important factor in maximizing the initial drying rate and preserving digestible
dry matter. A full width swath will increase the drying surface of the swath by 2.8 times, and moisture reductions from 85 to 60% can be reached in as little as 5 to 7 hours. Haylage from
wide swaths has been shown to have lower respiration losses during drying, greater total
digestible nutrients, and more lactic and acetic acid, improving forage quality and fermentation.
During this phase, a wide swath is more important than conditioning as most of the respiration
takes place in the leaves. While conditioning is important for drying stems, it has less impact on
drying leaves and therefore will have little effect on this initial moisture loss. This means that
for haylage, a wide swath may be more important than conditioning.

Phase Two: Stem Moisture Loss
The second phase in the drying process includes moisture loss from the stems in addition to the
leaves. Once moisture levels have dropped to the point where plant respiration ceases, the
closing of the stomata traps the remaining moisture, slowing further drying. At this stage,
conditioning can help increase the drying rate because it provides openings within the plant’s
structure, providing an exit path for moisture and allowing drying to continue at a faster rate.
For maximum effectiveness, be sure the conditioner is adjusted properly based on the stem
thickness (roughly 5% of leaves showing some bruising) and choose the best conditioner based
on your forage type. For example, roller conditioners are often preferred for alfalfa due to
reduced leaf loss.

Phase Three: Loss of Tightly Held Water
The final phase of the drying process is the loss of tightly held water, particularly from the
stems. Stems generally have a lower surface to volume ratio, fewer stomata, and a semi-
impervious waxy cuticle that minimizes water loss so conditioning is critical to enhance drying
during this phase.

Additional Factors
In addition to swath width and conditioning, several other strategies can be used to improve
drying time. Be sure to cut forages at the proper height, leaving 2 to 3 inches for alfalfa and 4
inches for cool-season grasses. Not only will this result in improved stand persistence, earlier
regrowth, and sooner subsequent cuttings, but the stubble will help to elevate the swath and
promote air flow and rapid drying. If possible, mow earlier in the day, preferably mid- to late-
morning after the dew has dried off. This will allow for a full day of drying right away,
maximizing exposure to sunlight and resulting in a faster drop in moisture and reduced
respiration. And finally, raking should occur when the forage is above 40% moisture. Raking
the forage while it is still pliable helps to reduce leaf loss and maintain forage quality. Adjust
the rake to minimize the amount of tines touching the ground to avoid soil contamination.

In conclusion, cutting in the morning and using wide swaths to take advantage of sunlight is key
to both faster drying and preserving digestible dry matter. Remember, a wide swath enhances
leaf drying while conditioning expedites stem drying; both are needed to make high quality hay.

New MARBIDCO Pandemic Adjustment Loan Program is Available

Annapolis (April 8, 2020)….The Maryland Agricultural and Resource-Based Industry Development Corporation (MARBIDCO) has established the Pandemic Adjustment Loan Fund Program to help Maryland’s food and fiber producers, harvesters and primary processors adjust to the business disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The program offers low cost loans with flexible terms for working capital or equipment purchases. The maximum individual loan amount is $10,000, and no collateral security is required to be pledged to receive a loan.

“Many Maryland farmers and other rural businesses are rapidly altering their operations to adjust to changing market conditions in response to the coronavirus pandemic, and some are pivoting to serve new customers and markets almost on the fly,” said Steve McHenry, MARBIDCO’s Executive Director. “This new loan program is designed to get money very quickly into the hands of rural business owners for the purchase of materials and equipment via an easy-to-complete application process.” MARBIDCO has available $1.2 million to lend through this program.

Applicants for this program must currently be operating their qualifying business enterprises in a substantial manner (e.g., as farmers, loggers, seafood harvesters, or as primary food/fiber processors). Spin-off activities of the existing main business enterprise are eligible and encouraged, but purely start-up enterprises are not eligible. Eligible farms and rural businesses can apply for loans up to $3,000 in working capital and up to $10,000 for equipment purchases at a low interest rate with flexible terms. Loan repayments will be made interest-only for five months beginning in August, followed by amortizing payments for 12 to 36 months with a fixed rate of 3.75% starting next year. Borrowers who make all their payments will receive a 10% grant back (of the original amount borrowed) at the end of the loan term.

Working capital includes (but is not limited to): planting materials such as seeds, fertilizers and plastic covers, hand tools, advertising and marketing expenses, and hired labor. Tangible equipment includes equipment with 7 years or more usual lifespan such as: motorized equipment, vehicles, commercial kitchen facilities, engine replacement, refrigeration units, etc.

To further assist Maryland’s farm and rural businesses during this time, MARBIDCO is also reducing the interest rates on its core loan programs by 100 basis points for borrowers that may be looking for more traditional term loan financing. These programs include: Maryland Resource-Based Industry Financing Fund, Maryland Vineyard/Hopyard/Orchard Planting Loan Fund, Rural Business Equipment and Working Capital Loan Fund, and Forestry Equipment and Working Capital Loan Fund. ​​Additional information on these programs is also available on our website.

Applications for the Pandemic Adjustment Loan Fund must be submitted by May 31st.  The application form is available on the MARBIDCO website at www.marbidco.org. For questions, please call the MARBIDCO office at (410) 267-6807. Due to current social distancing procedures, phone calls may not be readily answered (but all calls will be returned).

Contact: Steve McHenry
410-267-6807
smchenry@marbidco.org

SPRING WEED CONTROL FOR PASTURE AND HAYFIELDS

Dr. Amanda Grev, Pasture & Forage Specialist
University of Maryland Extension

As things are greening up this spring, you may notice a few not-so-friendly plants popping up around your fields, especially given the milder weather this past winter. If you haven’t already done so, now is the time to scout your pastures and hayfields in search of winter annual and biennial weeds. When it comes to weed control, timing of herbicide application is critical and it is important to spray when weeds are most susceptible to achieve maximum effectiveness.

Winter annuals typically germinate in the fall, overwinter, and complete their reproductive cycle in the spring or early summer. Common winter annual species include chickweed, purple deadnettle, field pennycress, henbit, horseweed/marestail, shepherd’s purse, and the mustard species.  Annuals are best controlled during the seedling and early vegetative stage when they are young and actively growing. Herbicide applications will be more effective if made at this stage while they are still vegetative and more susceptible and will prevent them from flowering and producing seed.  At this time of year, these winter annuals are growing rapidly and have already or will soon begin to flower and set seed. If the winter annuals in your fields have moved beyond this stage, an application may offer some control but you may also want to take note of those weedy areas now and target them later this year with a late fall application.

Biennials live for two growing seasons, with the first year consisting of only vegetative growth as a seedling and rosette and the second year consisting of vegetative growth and also reproductive growth in the form of an elongated flower stalk. Common biennial species include burdock, bull thistle, musk thistle, and wild carrot. These weeds are best controlled during the seedling and rosette stage, and should be treated now while they are smaller and more susceptible and before they begin to bolt.

There are a number of herbicides available for control of broadleaf weeds. Herbicide selection should be based on the type of forage and weed species present. The most common herbicides used for control of broadleaf weeds in grass hay or pasture are the plant growth regulator herbicides, which includes products containing 2,4-D, dicamba, triclopyr, aminopyralid, picloram, or a mix of these (see the table below for a list of common products). These products are safe if applied to grass forages at the labeled rates but can kill or injure desirable broadleaf forages (i.e. clover) in grass-legume mixed pastures.

If weedy annual grasses such as crabgrass, foxtail, panicum, and Japanese stiltgrass are problematic, pendimethalin (Prowl H2O) now has a supplemental label that allows for its use on established perennial pastures or hayfields grown for grazing, green chop, silage, or hay production. It may be applied to perennial grass stands or alfalfa-grass mixed stands. Prowl H2O may be applied as a single application in the early spring, or for more complete control it can be applied as a split application with the first application in early spring and the second application after first cutting. Keep in mind, this herbicide is a pre-emergent herbicide, meaning it will only control weeds if applied prior to germination. If soil temperatures in your area are already above 50°F it is likely that crabgrass and stiltgrass has already germinated, but a split application of Prowl H2O now and after first cutting can help control foxtail. There are currently no herbicides labeled to control emerged weedy grasses in grass stands or alfalfa/grass mixes.

Note that if forages were recently seeded and are not yet established many of these herbicides can cause severe crop injury. Most herbicide labels for cool-season perennial grasses state that the grasses should be well established with at least 4-5 inches of growth, although some labels are more restrictive than this. In addition, some of these herbicides have haying or grazing restrictions following application. Always read and follow the guidelines listed on the product label for proper rates, timing, residual effects, and any grazing or harvest restrictions following application.

Lastly, remember that while herbicides can be a useful tool for weed management in pastures and hayfields, they are not the only option for weed control. A program that integrates several different control strategies is generally more successful than relying on a single method. For maximum results, include cultural practices such as selecting adapted species and maintaining optimum soil fertility, mechanical practices such as timely mowing or clipping to suppress weed seed production, and biological practices such as utilizing livestock for controlled grazing or browsing. And remember that weeds are opportunistic; the best method for weed control is competition with a healthy, dense stand of desirable forage species.

Product Active Ingredients Application Rate* General/Restricted Use
2,4-D 2,4-D 1 to 2 qt/A General
Banvel/Clarity dicamba 0.5 to 2 pt/A General
Crossbow 2,4-D + triclopyr 1 to 6 qt/A General
GrazonNext HL 2,4-D + aminopyralid 1.2 to 2.1 pt/A General
Grazon P+D 2,4-D + picloram 2 to 8 pt/A Restricted
Milestone aminopyralid 3 to 7 fl. oz/A General
PastureGard HL triclopyr + fluroxypyr 0.75 to 4 pt/A General
Prowl H2O pendimethalin 1.1 to 4.2 qt/A General
Remedy Ultra 4L triclopyr 0.5 to 4 pt/A General
Stinger clopyralid 0.7 to 1.3 pt/A General
Surmount picloram + fluroxypyr 3 to 6 pt/A Restricted
WeedMaster 2,4-D + dicamba 1 to 4 pt/A General

*For use in established grass pasture or hayfields

MANAGEMENT TIPS TO HARVEST HIGH QUALITY WINTER FORAGE

Jeff Semler, Principal Agriculture Agent
University of Maryland Extension, Washington County

Article adapted with permission from information provided by Tom Kilcer, certified crop adviser in Kinderhook, N.Y.

In most of our region, the warm temperatures have kick started the winter forage. This crop can give you the earliest and the highest quality forage for your livestock. Now is the time to add nitrogen and sulfur, which can save you on protein supplements by allowing you to harvest high-protein forage.

Yield potential was set last fall, depending on planting date and available nitrogen. These two factors generate the number of fall tillers that help set the yield potential for the following spring.

While planting date is the most important factor, there is still potential for economical yields so long as the stand came through winter.

1. Provide sulfur for more protein. Sulfur has long been an overlooked plant nutrient. Prior to the clean air act, our sulfur came in our rain. Sulfur is critical for protein formation and should be included with any nitrogen application to winter forage. For example, adding extra nitrogen — 115 pounds — without sulfur only provided 12% crude protein. Adding a lesser amount of nitrogen with sulfur provided 17% crude protein. For a field that did not get manure last fall (a major on-farm sulfur source) an effective ratio is roughly 1 pound of sulfur for every 10 pounds of nitrogen. This is good for all cool-season grasses in addition to winter forage grains, such as triticale.Sulfur is also critical for corn and especially sorghum, which can produce much higher protein in the forage.

2. Increase N application. Research has shown that even if you immediately incorporated manure the previous fall before planting, an application of spring nitrogen is still needed.

In one study, spring fertilizer application didn’t increase the spring yield of triticale on manured ground but it did raise the crude protein from 9% to over 19%, which can potentially save money on purchased protein.

Many farms apply between 75 and 100 pounds of nitrogen an acre in spring. Even if you applied manure prior to planting in the fall, it is suggested increase this to 125 pounds an acre to boost forage protein and save on purchased protein. Remember, a 3-ton dry matter yield at flag leaf stage will remove 192 pounds of nitrogen at 20% crude protein. What is not used by the winter forage will still be used by the following crop.

One caution, don’t try this higher rate on rye. Rye has limited tillering and produces a tall but thinner stand. It is very prone to lodging when more than 50 pounds of nitrogen an acre are applied.

Triticale is only two-thirds the height of rye and is resistant to lodging. Several university trials have found that triticale yields 35% higher than rye because of the higher tiller density.

3. Add an antivolatilization agent. It is highly recommended to add an antivolatilization agent in the spring. This will inhibit the urease enzyme from splitting the urea into ammonia that could be lost. Trials have found that urea loss in fields treated with an antivolatilization agent were 63% less than in fields that were untreated. The antivolatilization compound increases the chance of full return on your fertilizer investment.

4. Know when to harvest. For those new to growing winter forage, it is ideal to harvest at the flag leaf stage (stage 9) for optimum quality. Stage 8 does not have higher quality than stage 9, and you can get a substantial yield drag from harvesting too soon.

If temperatures are warmer than normal, push to harvest the forage at the flag leaf stage. Conversely, if it is at stage 8 and there is a week of rain forecasted, get it cut so you have quality forage.