2022 Corn, Soybean, and Wheat Fungicide Efficacy Tables

Andrew Kness, Agriculture Agent | akness@umd.edu
University of Maryland Extension, Harford County

Each year, data from Universities around the country are aggregated and used to update fungicide efficacy guides for corn, soybean, and wheat. These tables are put together by the Crop Protection Network and can be found on cropprotectionnetwork.org.

These tables serve as handy reference guides to determine the best chemistry to manage certain diseases. The ratings in the table reflect the relative efficacy of a product to manage a given disease, it does not rate yield response to a fungicide. Links to the tables are found below, or contact your Extension agent for a copy.

Soybean seedling diseases

Soybean foliar diseases

Corn foliar diseases

Wheat foliar diseases

April 2022 Grain Market Report

Dale Johnson, Farm Management Specialist
University of Maryland

Information from USDA WASDE report

Attached is the summary for the April 2022 WASDE.

Corn

There were no changes on the corn supply side from the March 9 WASDE estimates. On the demand side, there were minor changes but total use and Ending stocks remained the same. Ending stocks are estimated to be 1,440 million bushel, with a stocks-to-use ratio of 9.6%. December 2022 Corn futures remain in a bullish volatile market with prices increasing from $6.37 on March 9 to a high of $7.18 on April 8 as extraordinary world events drive market prices up. A lower than expected prospective plantings report on March 31 pegged planting at 89.5 million contributed to higher prices for the 2022 crop year.

Soybean

There were no changes on the soybean supply side from the March 9 WASDE estimates. On the demand side, export estimates were increased by 25 million bushel, seed was increased by 4 million bushel and the residual estimate was decreased by 3 million bushel. This resulted in a lower estimate of ending stocks at 260 million bushel and a decrease in the stocks-to-use ratio from 6.4% to 5.8%. November 2022 futures prices have been volatile the past month. A higher than expected prospective plantings report on March 31 pegged planting at 91 million contributed to a price dip but has since recovered to a high of $14.98 on April 8.

Wheat

On the supply side, import estimates were decreased by 5 million bushel. On the demand side, Feed & Residual was decreased 10 million bushel. Export estimate was decrease by 25 million bushel. These changes increased the ending stocks by 30 million bushel to 678 million bushel and the stocks to use ratio increased from 33.4% to 35.5%. On March 3 & 7, the market was limit up as trading was halted on those days. The market then went limit down on March 8, 9 , & 10. On March 9 &10 there was no trading. The market has declined since then from the $12.50 range to a high of $10.60 on April 8.

Suggestions for Dealing With Herbicide Shortages for 2022

1Kurt Vollmer, Weed Management Specialist | kvollmer@umd.edu and 2Mark VanGessel, Weed Management Specialist 
1University of Maryland Extension and 2University of Delaware

The shortage of glyphosate (Roundup, Gly Star, etc.) and glufosinate (Liberty, Interline, etc.) herbicides are forcing farmers to seek other options for burndown and postemergence spray. No one anticipated this shortage and very little research has been done to address this issue. Many of us had to dust off our notes from the early 1990’s, the time before cheap glyphosate was available. One thing is certain, alternative weed control options will require more targeted management. The key is to plan ahead, select herbicides based on the weeds in the field, and make timely applications. Your mindset needs to be that you are not substituting a herbicide for glyphosate, rather you are using a different herbicide that has its own set of recommendations and limitations.

Alternative herbicides will not control as many weed species as glyphosate; in fact, some are only effective on a few weed species. Weed populations differ from field to field, so it is likely that herbicide mixtures will need to be adjusted for specific fields. Scouting will be key to selecting the right herbicide combination for a particular field. Scouting should be performed multiple times during the growing season to identify the species present and be sure weeds are small at time of application. In addition, it is important to check after a treatment is made to be sure it was effective.

Field records and past experience will help you decide which fields to prioritize for treatment with glyphosate or glufosinate. Targeting those “problem” fields or fields that will be rotated to vegetables for glyphosate or glufosinate applications.

Making Glyphosate Go Further

Use the correct glyphosate rate for the situation. In the past few years, many have simply used a quart of glyphosate (regardless of brand) because it was easy and still quite cost-effective. Matching the rate based on formulation and weed size will help conserve glyphosate and allow more acres to be treated. The amount of glyphosate in formulated products ranges from 41% to 51.2%. In practical terms, the rate of various brands can vary widely. For example, the Roundup PowerMax 3 rate for most annual weeds is 20 fl oz, while the same amount of glyphosate in a popular generic version is 32 fl oz.

Also, using glyphosate at higher use rates often overcomes issues that could reduce performance. So be sure to review the label for recommended adjuvants and any tank mixtures to avoid.

Start Clean

“Starting clean” means weeds are dead at planting. This is important since it is difficult to control many species like horseweed or Italian ryegrass after planting. Spring tillage is an option for replacing burndown herbicides; but tillage can negatively impact soil health, and stimulate the emergence of weeds such as common ragweed and Palmer amaranth.

For no-till corn, paraquat plus atrazine or paraquat plus simazine have worked very well on most of our acreage, including fields with horseweed and seedling grasses. One exception is Italian ryegrass, and this is a situation that may warrant using glyphosate.

For no-till soybeans, which are often sprayed 2 to 4 weeks later than corn, winter annual weeds will be larger and more challenging to control. Paraquat plus metribuzin is effective on smaller broadleaf weeds. Back in the ‘90’s when glyphosate was too expensive to spray across all acres, sequential applications of paraquat were commonly used. The recommendation was to use paraquat plus metribuzin 2 to 3 weeks before planting and then a second application at planting with the residual herbicides.

Fields with “problem” winter annual weeds may need an early herbicide application followed by an at-planting treatment. Herbicide options for soybean burndown include Sharpen, Elevore, 2,4-D or dicamba for horseweed; Canopy EX plus 2,4-D for field pansy and primrose control; metribuzin for chickweed and henbit; and Select (clethodim) for grass control (although clethodim is weak on annual bluegrass). Tankmixing broadleaf herbicides such as 2,4-D or dicamba with clethodim can reduce grass control; using higher rates of clethodim and spraying smaller grasses can reduce the likelihood of antagonism. The alternative is to separate applications. Clethodim and other grass herbicides should be made 2-3 days before or 7 days after a broadleaf herbicide.

Paraquat plus metribuzin is useful for terminating cover crops, including legumes and brassicas. Paraquat is more effective for terminating winter wheat or cereal rye when it is applied at the boot stage or later. Delaying cover crop termination until 7 to 14 days before planting will enhance overall weed control by allowing more cover crop biomass to form, which results in fewer weeds emerging and slowing the growth of emerging weeds. Paraquat applications before the boot stage often allow cereals to regrow. Clethodim could be used to control cereal cover crops before the boot stage.

Burndown for double-cropped soybeans will also be challenging without glyphosate and/or glufosinate. Paraquat and 2,4-D are not good options as they are more likely to move off-target that time of year. This may be another situation that gets priority for glyphosate and/or glufosinate applications.

Include Residual Herbicides at Planting

A good residual program will help delay a postemergence herbicide application. Two or more herbicide groups will be needed to provide broad-spectrum control of all the potential weeds that may emerge. A corn program should include at least atrazine and a group 15 herbicide such as S-metolachlor or acetochlor. Using products that include group 27 herbicides (Balance Flexx, Acuron, Corvus, Lumax) can also help.

A soybean program should include at least two effective herbicide modes-of-action from group 14 (Valor, Authority), group 5 (metribuzin), group 15 (Dual, Warrant, Zidua), or group 3 (Prowl). Group 15 herbicides provide good grass control and can reduce the likelihood of needing to treat postemergence with a product such as clethodim (Select) or sethoxydim (Poast). Several prepackaged mixtures of these herbicides are also available but be sure to check to ensure they are the appropriate rates for your situation. Regardless of what programs are chosen, an activating rainfall of about half inch will be needed.

Make Timely Postemergence Applications

Postemergence control is more successful with small weeds; thus avoiding the urge to wait for all weeds to emerge prior to spraying or cultivating. Corn is most susceptible to yield loss from weed competition during the V1 to V6 growth stages, and soybean at the V1 to V5 growth stages.

Because it is cooler during the early stages of corn growth than soybeans, it creates a wider window of application for corn. Postemergence treatments in corn are more effective when corn is less than 12 inches tall because it allows the use of atrazine. In corn, group 27 herbicides such as Armezon, Callisto, or Laudis plus atrazine provide effective control of weeds like Palmer amaranth. Impact, Armezon, and Accent Q will provide good to excellent control of most grass species.

Postemergence herbicide applications in soybeans are most effective when soybeans have less than 4 trifoliates, and weeds are less than 4 inches tall. In local research, this is typically 3 to 4 weeks after planting. In soybean, postemergence herbicide options will be trait-dependent. Group 14 herbicides such as Cobra, Reflex, and Ultra Blazer can be used in non-GMO soybean. Dicamba-containing products such as Xtendimax, Engenia, or Tavium can be applied to Xtend and Xtendflex soybeans; and 2,4-D choline (Enlist One, Enlist Duo) can be applied to Enlist E3 soybeans. Glufosinate and glyphosate-based products can also be applied to Enlist E3 and Xtendflex soybean. If planning to use these products, growers need to be aware of restrictions as well as specific requirements for adjuvants, nozzles, buffers, etc. which can be found at

Residual herbicides such as Dual, Warrant, or Zidua can be included with postemergence treatments to help extend weed control capabilities until the crop canopies. (note: Reflex provides both postemergence and residual control). This will be cheaper than making multiple postemergence applications.

Optimize Herbicide Performance

It is important to maximize the performance of herbicides and most of this information is available on herbicide labels. Adequate spray coverage is important for contact herbicides like glufosinate and fomesafen. Applications of contact herbicides should be made at 15 to 20 gallons per acre with nozzles that produce medium to coarse droplets to ensure good coverage. Growers should also follow recommendations for adjuvants.

When tankmixing herbicides it can be challenging if recommendations differ by product, such as droplet size does not match or required adjuvants may differ. For instance, Enlist One requires large droplets to avoid drift while a contact herbicide, like Reflex, recommends smaller droplets to improve spray coverage. In this case, select a nozzle from the Enlist label that produces the smaller droplets.

Environmental conditions such as temperature and time of day will also affect the performance of herbicides. In particular, conditions during burndown applications can be challenging; and if applications are made during poor growing conditions, control is often reduced. There are very few alternatives to waiting for better weather. Generally, contact herbicides such as paraquat and fomesafen are more effective when sunlight is more intense. Glufosinate has specific recommendations for applications between the hours of 10 AM and 2 PM to ensure there is adequate sunlight to maximize performance.

Including other tactics to reduce weed competition can enhance an effective herbicide program. A healthy, competitive crop will reduce late-season weed emergence. The quicker a crop canopy develops, the less likely it will be for additional weeds to emerge. Reducing soybean row spacing from 30 to 15 inches will allow for quicker canopy closure. A timely cultivation can replace a postemergence herbicide application in fields with light weed pressure.

Preparing ahead of time and considering all the options will help ensure the highest level of weed control. Have a conversation with your crop advisor on which options are best for your fields and focus on managing small weeds.

For additional resources on herbicide selection see your extension weed management guide available at www.pubs.ext.vt.edu/456/456-016/456-016.html; and for weed identification and integrated weed management tactics see Virginia Tech Weed ID website (https://weedid.cals.vt.edu/) and Get Rid Of Weeds (www.GROWiwm.org).

Field Crop Budgets for 2022

Shannon Dill, Principal Agriculture Agent
University of Maryland Extension, Talbot County

The University of Maryland Extension has updated www.go.umd.edu/grainmarketing site with new input data and spray programs for the 2022 field crop budgets.

Crop Budgets

Cost of production is very important when making decisions related to your farm enterprise and grain marketing. Enterprise budgets provide valuable information regarding individual enterprises on the farm. This tool enables farm managers to make decisions regarding enterprises and plan for the coming production year. An enterprise budget uses farm revenue, variable cost, fixed cost and net income to provide a clear picture of the financial health of each farm enterprise.

The 2022 Maryland enterprise budgets were developed using average yields and estimated input cost based upon producer and farm supplier data. There has been a lot of fluctuation in fertilizer prices, pesticide availability and fuel expenses. The figures presented are averages and vary greatly from one farm and region to the other. Therefore, it is crucial to input actual farm data when completing enterprise budgets for your farm.

How to Use University Enterprise Budgets

Enterprise budgets can be used as a baseline for your operation. Make changes to these budgets to include your production techniques, inputs and overall management. New spray programs were added for herbicide resistant weeds.

The budgets are available electronically in PDF or Excel. Use this document as a start or reference to create your crop budgets. If you have problems downloading any of these budgets, contact information is located on the website.

Average Cost Per Acre, 2022 
Year Corn

No Till

Corn

Conventional

Full Season

Soybeans

Wheat Double Crop

Wheat/Beans

2021 $540 $592 $346 $401 $608
2022 $698 $749 $402 $490 $749
Percent Change +29% +26% +16% +22% +23%

March 2022 Grain Market Report

Dale Johnson, Farm Management Specialist
University of Maryland

Information from USDA WASDE report

Attached is the summary for the March 2022 WASDE.

Corn

There were no changes on the corn supply side from the February 9 WASDE estimates. On the demand side, ethanol estimates increased 25 million bushel and esports increased 75 million bushel for a total demand increase of 100 million bushel. Ending stocks are estimated to be 1,440 million bushel, decreasing the stocks-to-use ratio from 10.4% in February to 9.6% in March. March 2022 Corn futures increased from $6.47 on February 9 to peak at $8.00 on March 4 and settle back to $7.45 March 9 as extraordinary world events drive market prices up.

Soybeans

There were no changes on the soybean supply side from the February 9 WASDE estimates. On the demand side, export estimates were increased by 40 million bushel and the residual estimate was decreased by 1 million bushel. This resulted in a lower estimate of ending stocks at 285 million bushel and a decrease in the stocks-to-use ratio from 7.4% to 6.4%. March 2022 futures price increased dramatically from $15.95 on February 9 to peak at $17.65 on February 24 and settle back to $16.87 on February 9 as extraordinary world events drive market prices up.

Wheat

On the supply side, import estimates were decreased by 5 million bushel. On the demand side, export estimates were decreased 10 million bushel. These changes increased the ending stocks by 5 million bushel to 653 million bushel and the stocks to use ratio increased from 33.4% to 33.8%. However, extraordinary world events drove March futures from $7.85 on February 9 to peak at 14.25 on March 7. On March 3 & 7, the market was limit up as trading was halted on those days. The market then went limit down on March 8, 9 , & 10. On March 9 &10 there was no trading. The market went limit down at the opening. On March 11 the market closed at $10.90 after the wildest ride in history.

February 2022 Grain Market Report

Dale Johnson, Farm Management Specialist
University of Maryland

Information from USDA WASDE report

Attached is the summary for the February 2022 WASDE.

Corn

There were no changes in corn estimates from the January 12 WASDE report to the February 9 WASDE report. Ending stocks are estimated to be 1,540 million bushel with a stocks to use ratio of 10.4%. March 2022 Corn futures increased from $5.99 on January12 to peak at $6.45 on February 9 at the time of this report.

Soybeans

There were no changes in supply estimates. On the demand side, the estimate for crushings was increased by 215 million bushels. This resulted in a lower estimate of ending stocks at 325 million bushel and a decrease in the stocks-to-use ratio from 8.0% to 7.4%. March 2022 futures price increased dramatically from $13.99 on January 12 to peak at $15.97on February 9 at the time of this report- OH! so close to $16.00 beans!

Wheat

On the supply side, there were no changes in the estimates from January to February. On the demand side, Food estimate was decreased by 3 million bushel. Seed estimate was decreased by 2 million bushel. Export estimate was decreased by 15 million bushel. These changes increased the ending stocks by 20 million bushel to 648 million bushel and the stocks to use ratio increased from 32.0% to 33.4%. March futures increased from $7.58 on January 12 to peaked at 8.32 on January 25 but have since backed off to trade at a high of $7.88 pm February 9 at the time of this report.

On-Farm Research opportunity for farmers

The module “Farmer Adoption of In-Season Nitrogen Decision Support Tools” is approved for 0.25 Nutrient Management CEUs in Maryland and Delaware, and is available until February 15. It provides education, but is also letting farmers know about an opportunity to participate in UMD/UD on-farm research.

Please visit the link if interested: https://sites.udel.edu/canr-nmeq/continuing-education/farmer-adoption-of-in-season-nitrogen-decision-support-tools-0-25-ceu/

January 2022 Grain Market Report

Dale Johnson, Farm Management Specialist
University of Maryland

Information from USDA WASDE report

Attached is the summary for the January 2022 WASDE.

Corn

2021/22 harvested acres estimate was increased by 300,000 acres which increased production and supply estimate by 52 million bushel. On the demand side there were minor adjustments with the net effect of a demand estimate increase of 5 million bushel. The result of these supply and demand estimates was an increase in ending stocks of 47 million bushels increasing the stocks-to-use ratio to 10.4% from 10.1 in December. March 2022 futures increased from $5.92 on December 9 to peaked at $6.18 on December 28 and close at $5.99 on January 12.

Soybeans

There were minor adjustments in soybean supply and demand estimates resulting in an increase of ending stocks estimate of 10 million bushels and an increase in the stocks-to-use ratio from 7.8% to 8.0 %. January 2022 futures price increased dramatically from $12.65 on December 9 to close at $13.91 on January 12.

Wheat

On the supply side, wheat import estimate was decreased by 10 million bushel. On the demand side, Feed and Residual estimate was decreased by 25 million bushel and export estimate was decreased by 15 million bushels. The net effect of supply and demand adjustments was an increase in ending stocks of 30 million bushel. The stocks-to-use ratio increased from 29.9% to 32%. December futures decreased from $7.77 on December 9 to $7.58 on January 12.

Register For The 2022 Virtual Agronomy Meeting

10 a.m. – 2:30 p.m.

This meeting will cover timely topics related to corn, soybean, and small grain production in Maryland. Hear from University of Maryland and other regional experts covering topics, such as:

  • Weed management with a limited toolbox
  • Hedging your bets to maximize profitability of fungicides on corn and soybeans
  • Agriculture leasing and agriculture law update
  • Corn nitrogen use following cover crops
  • Soil fertility and 4R

This meeting satisfies credits for pesticide applicator and nutrient management voucher renewals.

Register online: https://go.umd.edu/virtualagronomymeeting