Debating Power & Empire
England’s New World empire emerged within a political, legal, and cultural context shaped not only by the peoples they encountered in the Atlantic world, but also by deep contests over power within England itself and between England and other European countries with New World claims. As James I and his son Charles I sought to expand England’s imperial reach into the Americas, they entered a contest with Spain over those claims. That contest in turn intensified disputes with Parliament over the extent of the King’s power.
In the New World, Charles I granted colonies to his friends and allies with immense legal privileges of governance, based on his supposed rights as a Christian prince. While English labor norms were profoundly hierarchical, they were not slavery: the poor could be forced to labor for a year or more at a time, and masters had legal privileges over their servants. Since outright slavery did not exist in England, sharp questions emerged in the New World as the crown sought to follow Spain’s model: what was the status of so-called “Christian,” “Negroe,” and “Indian” “servants? Should all be treated alike? Or should England follow more closely the model of the Spanish and Portuguese who, by the late sixteenth century, were coercing Indians into tributary status via the encomienda system as well as in many cases enslaving them; they were also deliberately enslaving Africans. To what extent were the English coercing either Africans or Native American Indians into full, lifelong slavery from the beginning in different English colonies? How much power should local freeholders have, vis-à-vis the Proprietors or the Crown?
These debates occurred not only within colonial spaces but were endemic with England itself. Not only was the crown directly involved in colonization from the beginning, but colonial struggles over power often influenced events within England itself, and vice-versa. Power, in short, was debated and argued over on every level.
