A NEW MONARCHY

English Bill of Rights (1689)

With a quick end to the Glorious Revolution, and the ascension of William and Mary to the throne, a bill of rights was passed to enshrine fundamental English liberties into law. In the face of years of monarchial attacks, fear of absolutism lurked in the long shadow of the throne. 

 

 

 

Introduction by Lauren Michalak 

William III and Mary’s defeat of James II in the Glorious Revolution did not settle fears of absolutism completely.  Parliament was concerned with ensuring English rights and liberties wouldn’t be trampled on again by a power-hungry monarch, and set about to protect those liberties and rights while also ensuring the line of succession to prevent Catholic (i.e. absolutists) from making legitimate claims on the throne.  Another thorny issue that needed to be dealt with was exactly who would rule England.  Mary had the more direct link to the crown as the daughter of James II, whereas William was a nephew to James—and male.  Ultimately it was decided that both William and Mary would be crowned rulers, though their power was manifested and under the direction of William (see Roger Morrice’s Entering Book for a detailed look at the Parliamentary debates on this subject).  The line of succession was set that any heirs from William and Mary would be first to inherit the throne, followed by Princess Anne (Mary’s sister).  [DO WE WANT TO SAY ANYTHING ABOUT MARY AND ANNE’S EXPERIENCE GROWING UP IN CHARLES II’S COURT?]

The English Bill of Rights details the many abuses of James II and proclaims limitations on monarchs to protect English subjects from arbitrary rule.  What are some of the abuses raised in this document?  How do they relate to or reflect other documents in this volume?  How are subjects protected under the English Bill of Rights?  How strong do you think these protections are?

Background

Background Goes Here

Further Reading
Citations

An Act Declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and Settling the Succession of the Crown

Whereas the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons assembled at Westminster, lawfully, fully and freely representing all the estates of the people of this realm, did upon the thirteenth day of February in the year of our Lord one thousand six hundred eighty-eight [old style date] present unto their Majesties, then called and known by the names and style of William and Mary, prince and princess of Orange, being present in their proper persons, a certain declaration in writing made by the said Lords and Commons in the words following, viz.:

Whereas the late King James the Second, by the assistance of divers evil counsellors, judges and ministers employed by him, did endeavour to subvert and extirpate the Protestant religion and the laws and liberties of this kingdom;

By assuming and exercising a power of dispensing with and suspending of laws and the execution of laws without consent of Parliament;

By committing and prosecuting divers worthy prelates for humbly petitioning to be excused from concurring to the said assumed power;

By issuing and causing to be executed a commission under the great seal for erecting a court called the Court of Commissioners for Ecclesiastical Causes;

By levying money for and to the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative for other time and in other manner than the same was granted by Parliament;

By raising and keeping a standing army within this kingdom in time of peace without consent of Parliament, and quartering soldiers contrary to law;

By causing several good subjects being Protestants to be disarmed at the same time when papists were both armed and employed contrary to law;

By violating the freedom of election of members to serve in Parliament;

By prosecutions in the Court of King’s Bench for matters and causes cognizable only in Parliament, and by divers other arbitrary and illegal courses;

And whereas of late years partial corrupt and unqualified persons have been returned and served on juries in trials, and particularly divers jurors in trials for high treason which were not freeholders;

And excessive bail hath been required of persons committed in criminal cases to elude the benefit of the laws made for the liberty of the subjects;

And excessive fines have been imposed;

And illegal and cruel punishments inflicted;

And several grants and promises made of fines and forfeitures before any conviction or judgment against the persons upon whom the same were to be levied;

All which are utterly and directly contrary to the known laws and statutes and freedom of this realm;

And whereas the said late King James the Second having abdicated the government and the throne being thereby vacant, his Highness the prince of Orange (whom it hath pleased Almighty God to make the glorious instrument of delivering this kingdom from popery and arbitrary power) did (by the advice of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and divers principal persons of the Commons) cause letters to be written to the Lords Spiritual and Temporal being Protestants, and other letters to the several counties, cities, universities, boroughs and cinque ports, for the choosing of such persons to represent them as were of right to be sent to Parliament, to meet and sit at Westminster upon the two and twentieth day of January in this year one thousand six hundred eighty and eight [old style date], in order to such an establishment as that their religion, laws and liberties might not again be in danger of being subverted, upon which letters elections having been accordingly made;

And thereupon the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons, pursuant to their respective letters and elections, being now assembled in a full and free representative of this nation, taking into their most serious consideration the best means for attaining the ends aforesaid, do in the first place (as their ancestors in like case have usually done) for the vindicating and asserting their ancient rights and liberties declare;

That the pretended power of suspending the laws or the execution of laws by regal authority without consent of Parliament is illegal;

That the pretended power of dispensing with laws or the execution of laws by regal authority, as it hath been assumed and exercised of late, is illegal;

That the commission for erecting the late Court of Commissioners for Ecclesiastical Causes, and all other commissions and courts of like nature, are illegal and pernicious;

That levying money for or to the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative, without grant of Parliament, for longer time, or in other manner than the same is or shall be granted, is illegal;

That it is the right of the subjects to petition the king, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal;

 

EARLY ACCESS:  Transcription is under editorial review and may contain errors.
Please do not cite or otherwise reproduce without permission.