Blueberry IPM Post Bloom – Diseases Pathogens

By Haley Sater
Agriculture Agent, Wicomico County
University of Maryland Extension
HSater@umd.edu

( Article from May 2021 issues of UME Fruit and Vegetable Newsletter)

Most blueberry cultivars here in Maryland bloomed and green fruit are developing. Now is the time when a variety of pathogens and pest will begin to take up residence in your field which can harm your developing crop. It is important to perform routine scouting throughout your farm and make sure that you’re not seeing symptoms of some of
the common pests and pathogens. Below is a description of several of the most common diseases and pests you may find at this time in your blueberries.

Pathogens to be on the lookout for:
During the cool, wet days where temperatures do not reach above 70 degrees you may begin to see symptoms of several fungal pathogens including botryosphaeria canker or stem blight, botrytis, anthracnose and powdery mildew. These conditions make for an ideal environment for some of these fungal pathogens to grow or spread.

Blueberry Pathognes
A.)  Botryosphaeria stem blight, Bill Cline NCSU.  B.) Botrytis, Caleb Slemmons, National Ecological Observatory Network. C.) Anthracnose, Bruce Watt, University of Maine D.)  Powdery Mildew, Florida Dept. of Agriculture. Bugwood.org

Botryosphaeria stem blight (A) will exhibit dieback symptoms. It is initially detectable as yellowing and reddening of leaves which will move down then stem as vascular tissue becomes blocked by the pathogen. Whereas, botryosphaeria canker will develop as stem lesions which will sometime become swollen resulting in the formation of a canker. If botryosphaeria stem blight or canker is observed the best method to prevent the spread is pruning the infected tissue and fruit clusters six inches below any infected stems. Then, remove pruned branches from the field.

Botrytis (B) also known as gray mold, affects both fruit and the plant. It infects the fruit from bloom. As with botryosphaeria, the best tactic to reduce the spread of this disease is by pruning out infected fruit clusters and wood, then removing clippings from the field.

Anthracnose (C) will appear as stem, bud and leaf lesions and may have orange spore masses. Infections will cause leaf browning and will move from top of the leaf to the bottom. If untreated, anthracnose will also cause fruit rot. Fungicides may be used to prevent further development of anthracnose during the green fruit
development stage.

Powdery mildew (D) will start as chlorotic discoloration spots and develop into powdery masses on leaves. The infection usually begins in the spring with young leaves and may become more severe throughout the season eventually causing defoliation. However, while unsightly, powdery mildew will not significantly damage the developing fruit crop and therefore no action is required.

Summary: Comparative efficacy of common active ingredients in organic insecticides against difficult to control insect pests

By Galen P. Dively, Terrence Patton, Lindsay Barranco, and Kelly Kulhanek.

 

The Full Article can be found online for free here: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/11/9/614 

 

According to USA organic standards, farmers can apply a certified allowable insecticide when all non-chemical practices fail to control pests. However, there exists a lack of control efficacy information to enable decision-making about which organic product works best for a given target pest. 

 

This paper summarize the results of 153 field trials on the control efficacy of common active ingredients in organic insecticides against groups of the most difficult to control insect pests. The performance of organic products Entrust (spinosad), Azera (pyrethrin and azadirachtin), PyGanic (pyrethrin) and Neemix (azadirachtin) varied widely among pest groups, as well as among pest species within a group, providing an overall reduction in pest infestations by 73.9%, 61.7%, 48.6% and 46.1%, respectively. 

 

Entrust was the most effective control option for many insect pests, particularly providing >75% control of flea beetles, Colorado potato beetle, cabbage worms, and alfalfa weevil. However, Entrust was relatively ineffective against sucking insects, particularly true bugs and aphids. Resistance to spinosad has occurred in several insect pests, especially diamondback moths, several thrips species, and Colorado potato beetles, so farmers should consider using other classes of insecticides in rotation with Entrust to reduce the risk of resistance development.

 

Azera provided >75% control of green peach aphid, flea beetles, Japanese beetle, Mexican bean beetle, potato leafhopper, and cabbage worms. PyGanic was less effective than Entrust and Azera but still provided >75% control of green peach aphid, flea beetles, and potato leafhopper. The growth inhibition effects of azadirachtin in Neemix were particularly effective against larvae of Mexican bean beetle and Colorado potato beetle, but were generally less effective in trials with insect infestations consisting mainly of adult stages. 

 

Those insect pests that were particularly difficult to control included thrips, stink bugs, cucumber beetles, and fruit worms. 

UME May Vegetable & Fruit Newsletter and Sweet Corn Needs Assessment Survey

The May issues of the UME Vegetable & Fruit Newsletter is now available.
You can download it and past issues here: https://extension.umd.edu/locations/anne-arundel-county/agriculture-food-systems. 

This issue has information about:
– June Vegetable insect scouting Tips
– Leafminers on Spinach, beets and Swiss Chard
– Edema Problem in Greenhouse Tomatoes
– Two Spotted Spider Mites in Strawberries
– Efficacy of Common Active Ingredients in Organic Insecticides
– How to Disinfect Stakes
– Blueberry IPM
– Primocane Blackberries
– Spotted Wing Drosophila Updated Insecticide Efficacy Chart
and more.

If you grow sweet corn please consider filling out the Corn Earworm Management in Sweet Corn Needs Assessment Survey.

Dr. Kelly Hamby, Associate Professor/Extension Specialist with the Department of Entomology at University of Maryland is leading a team of researchers who have developed a survey to prioritize research and extension efforts for improving corn earworm management in sweet corn throughout the Northeast. We appreciate your participation in this survey and will use results to develop a grant proposal to try to get federal funding to address these needs.

Survey link: https://ume.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9vRh1xHnDp4KEaa