A Boycott of Academic Ranking Systems?

university_68

Uni­ver­sit­ies and insti­tu­tions of higher edu­ca­tion across the globe are being impacted by struc­tural change, guided by prin­ciples of the entre­pren­eur­ial uni­ver­sity. The impos­i­tion of New Pub­lic Man­age­ment prin­ciples means that uni­ver­sit­ies are increas­ingly being man­aged like private enter­prises. Resources are being alloc­ated accord­ing to per­form­ance records and tar­get agree­ments. Aca­demic cap­it­al­ism has entered Ger­many, and its main instru­ments are uni­ver­sity depart­ment rank­ings and league tables. The down­side is an aca­demic routine biased towards quant­it­at­ive per­form­ance indic­at­ors (research fund­ing, num­ber of doc­tor­ates and gradu­ates) and a neg­lect of qual­it­at­ive cri­teria. Work in aca­demia has changed fun­da­ment­ally in both design and con­tent. Teach­ing and research are increas­ingly being obstruc­ted by the growth of admin­is­trat­ive respons­ib­il­it­ies. There is a logic of escal­a­tion inher­ent in per­form­ance meas­ure­ment exer­cises (“more and more and never enough”), res­ult­ing in work intens­i­fic­a­tion, stress, and over­load amongst all groups of the aca­demic work­force. Neg­at­ive effects on the qual­ity of research and teach­ing are increas­ingly being felt.

Continues here: A Boycott of Academic Ranking Systems? | Critical Legal Thinking.